What are the key differences between a continuation and a continuation-in-part?
While both continuation and continuation-in-part (CIP) applications are related to a prior application, there are key differences: Continuation: Repeats the entire disclosure of the prior application without adding new matter. Continuation-in-Part (CIP): According to MPEP ¶ 2.06, a CIP “repeats a substantial portion of prior Application No.[1], filed[2], and adds disclosure not presented in the…
Read MoreWhat happens if a continuation or divisional application contains new matter?
If a continuation or divisional application contains new matter not disclosed in the prior-filed application, the applicant will be required to either delete the benefit claim or change the relationship to a continuation-in-part application. This is because continuation and divisional applications cannot include new matter. As stated in MPEP ¶ 2.10.01: “Applicant is required to…
Read MoreWhat are the implications of claiming benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c)?
Claiming benefit under these statutes allows an application to receive the earlier filing date of a prior-filed application, which can be crucial for establishing priority and overcoming prior art. However, this claim also requires that the application does not contain new matter. The MPEP ¶ 2.10.01 states: “This form paragraph should be used when an…
Read MoreHow does an examiner determine if new matter is present in a continuation or divisional application?
Patent examiners carefully compare the content of the continuation or divisional application with the prior-filed application to identify any new matter. If they find information not disclosed in the prior application, they will issue a notice to the applicant. The MPEP ¶ 2.10.01 instructs examiners: “In bracket 1, provide an example of the matter not…
Read MoreHow does the presence of new matter affect the filing date of a continuation or divisional application?
The presence of new matter in a continuation or divisional application can significantly affect its filing date. If new matter is found, the application may lose the benefit of the earlier filing date for the new subject matter. According to MPEP ¶ 2.10.01: “Applicant is required to delete the benefit claim or change the relationship…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for filing a divisional or continuation application without an executed oath or declaration?
The MPEP 201.06(c) outlines the requirements for filing a divisional or continuation application without an executed oath or declaration: ’37 CFR 1.63(d) provides that a newly executed oath or declaration is not required in a continuation or divisional application filed by all or by fewer than all of the inventors named in a prior nonprovisional…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle applications with omitted drawings?
The USPTO treats applications with omitted drawings similarly to those with missing specification pages. According to MPEP 506: In the event that a page of the specification, or a portion thereof, or a page of the drawings, or a portion thereof, is inadvertently omitted from an application as filed, the application will be not be…
Read MoreCan new matter be added to a continuation application?
Can new matter be added to a continuation application? No, new matter cannot be added to a continuation application. A continuation application must disclose and claim only subject matter disclosed in the prior application. As stated in MPEP 201.07: “The disclosure presented in the continuation must not include any subject matter which would constitute new…
Read MoreHow does new matter in a continuation-in-part affect prior art considerations?
How does new matter in a continuation-in-part affect prior art considerations? The introduction of new matter in a continuation-in-part (CIP) application significantly affects prior art considerations. According to the MPEP 201.08: Only the claims of the continuation-in-part application that are disclosed in the manner provided by 35 U.S.C. 112(a) in the prior-filed application are entitled…
Read MoreHow does a continuation-in-part application affect patent term?
A continuation-in-part (CIP) application can have a complex effect on patent term. The MPEP 201.08 states: ‘A continuation-in-part application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date of an earlier nonprovisional application as to common subject matter.’ This has several implications for patent term: 20-year term: The patent term is generally 20 years from…
Read More