No more FAQs can be generated

All relevant information from MPEP 806.04(h) – Species Must Be Patentably Distinct From Each Other has been exhaustively covered in previous FAQs. No additional meaningful questions can be generated without repeating information. To learn more: MPEP species patentably distinct patent examination

Read More

What are ‘inter partes questions’ in patent examination?

‘Inter partes questions’ in patent examination refer to issues or matters that involve multiple parties or have the potential to affect multiple parties’ interests. These questions typically arise in proceedings where there are opposing parties, such as in patent interferences or inter partes reexaminations. The MPEP 713.06 prohibits examiners from discussing such questions ex parte:…

Read More

How should examiners handle perpetual motion applications?

According to MPEP 707.07(g), patent applications directed to perpetual motion require special handling. The MPEP states: “Where disclosure is directed to perpetual motion… the best prior art readily available should be cited and its pertinence pointed out without specifically applying it to the claims.” This means that for perpetual motion applications, examiners should: Cite the…

Read More

Where can I find information about the former public use proceedings process?

If you need information about the former public use proceedings process, which was discontinued in 2012, you should refer to an older version of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP). The current MPEP section 720 provides guidance on where to find this historical information: For information necessary regarding the former process, the August 2012…

Read More

What factors does an examiner consider when deciding whether to enter a supplemental amendment?

What factors does an examiner consider when deciding whether to enter a supplemental amendment? When deciding whether to enter a supplemental amendment, an examiner considers several factors. The MPEP 714.03(a) outlines these considerations: “The factors to be considered by the examiner for entry of a supplemental amendment include: (A) the state of preparation of a…

Read More

What are ‘extraordinary circumstances’ for using Patentability Reports?

The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 705 emphasizes that Patentability Reports should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. While the MPEP doesn’t provide an exhaustive list of what constitutes ‘extraordinary circumstances,’ we can infer from the context that these may include: Applications with claims spanning multiple, distinctly different technology areas Cases where the…

Read More