What are linking claims in patent applications?

Linking claims are special claims in patent applications that link inventions in different categories. According to MPEP 809: “Linking claims and the inventions they link together are usually either all directed to products or all directed to processes (i.e., a product claim linking properly divisible product inventions, or a process claim linking properly divisible process…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle restriction requirements when linking claims are present?

When linking claims are present in a patent application, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) follows specific procedures for handling restriction requirements. According to MPEP 809: “Where linking claims are present, a restriction can be required to subfamilies linked by the linking claim. It may be proper to require restriction, including an election…

Read More

How are linking claims treated during patent examination?

During patent examination, linking claims receive special treatment. The MPEP 809 states: “Linking claims must be examined with, and thus are considered part of, the invention elected. When all claims directed to the elected invention are allowable, should any linking claim be allowable, the restriction requirement between the linked inventions must be withdrawn.” This means…

Read More

Can withdrawn claims be reinstated after a restriction requirement?

Yes, withdrawn claims can be reinstated after a restriction requirement under certain conditions. The MPEP 809 provides guidance on this process: “Where such withdrawn claims have been canceled by applicant pursuant to the restriction requirement, upon the allowance of the linking claim(s), the examiner must notify applicant that any canceled, nonelected claim(s) which depends from…

Read More

What is a proper traverse of a restriction requirement with linking claims?

A proper traverse of a restriction requirement with linking claims must include a written statement that specifically points out the supposed errors in the requirement. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) Section 818.01(d) states: “Regardless of the presence of a linking claim, a proper traverse must include a written statement of the reasons for…

Read More

When can an applicant petition against a final restriction requirement with linking claims?

An applicant has two options for petitioning against a final restriction requirement with linking claims: Petition immediately after the restriction is made final, without waiting for a final action on the merits of the linking claims. Defer the petition until after the linking claims have been finally rejected, but no later than the notice of…

Read More

What happens to the right to petition if all linking claims are canceled after a final restriction?

The right to petition against a restriction requirement is preserved even if all linking claims are canceled after the restriction is made final. The MPEP Section 818.01(d) clearly states: “If restriction is made final following consideration of a traverse, the right to petition is preserved even if all linking claims are canceled.” This provision ensures…

Read More

What happens to non-elected inventions when a linking claim is found allowable?

When a linking claim is found allowable in a patent application, it can have significant implications for non-elected inventions. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 809 provides guidance on this situation: “When all claims directed to the elected invention are allowable, should any linking claim be allowable, the restriction requirement between the linked inventions…

Read More