What is required for conception to be legally complete?
For conception to be legally complete, several elements must be present according to MPEP 2138.04: Definite and permanent idea: The inventor must have formed a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operable invention. Every feature of the invention: The conception must include every feature or limitation of the invention as claimed. Enablement: The…
Read MoreCan a legal entity be listed as an inventor in a U.S. design patent application?
No, a legal entity cannot be listed as an inventor in a U.S. design patent application. The MPEP 2920.01 clearly states: “Under the laws of certain foreign countries, the creator may be a legal entity. Under U.S. national law, however, the inventor cannot be a juristic entity.” This means that while some foreign countries may…
Read MoreWhat happens if a juristic entity is incorrectly listed as an inventor in an international design application?
If a juristic entity is incorrectly listed as an inventor in an international design application designating the United States, it will result in a rejection of the application. The MPEP 2920.01 provides specific guidance on this issue: “Where a nonprovisional international design application identifies a juristic entity as an inventor, Form Paragraph 29.04 should be…
Read MoreWhat issues can be considered in ex parte reexamination ordered under 35 U.S.C. 304?
Ex parte reexamination ordered under 35 U.S.C. 304 is limited to considerations of prior art patents and printed publications. The MPEP states: “Rejections will not be based on matters other than patents or printed publications, such as public use or sale, inventorship, 35 U.S.C. 101, conduct issues, etc.” However, certain ancillary matters may be considered,…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between inventorship and ownership under Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(f)?
What is the difference between inventorship and ownership under Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(f)? Under Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(f), there is an important distinction between inventorship and ownership: Inventorship refers to the person or persons who actually conceived the invention. Ownership refers to the legal rights to the invention, which may be assigned or transferred. The…
Read MoreHow does inventorship affect prior art determination under 35 U.S.C. 102(e)?
Inventorship plays a crucial role in determining prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(e). The MPEP 2136.04 states: “If there is any difference in inventive entity, the patent may be applied in a rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e).” This means that even a slight difference in inventorship between the application and the potential prior art…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of inventorship in continuation-in-part applications?
Inventorship in continuation-in-part (CIP) applications has unique implications for prior art determination. The MPEP 2136.04 states: “If the application is a continuation-in-part of, or claims the benefit of the filing date of, a parent application naming A as the inventor, and the parent application was filed by A with a claim that was originally invented…
Read MoreWhat should I consider regarding inventorship when responding to a restriction requirement in an international design application?
When responding to a restriction requirement in an international design application, it’s important to consider the potential need to correct inventorship. This is particularly relevant if you’re cancelling non-elected designs, as it may affect who qualifies as an inventor for the remaining design(s). According to MPEP 2920.05(b): “Applicants should consider the need to correct inventorship…
Read MoreDoes an inventor need to know their invention will work for conception to be complete?
No, an inventor does not need to know that their invention will work for conception to be legally complete. According to MPEP 2138.04, the inventor’s belief in the success of the invention is not a requirement for conception. The MPEP cites the following case: “Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Barr Labs., Inc., 40 F.3d 1223, 1228,…
Read MoreHow is inventorship determined in an international design application designating the United States?
According to MPEP 2920.01, inventorship in an international design application designating the United States is determined based on the creator or creators listed in the publication of the international registration. Specifically, the MPEP states: “Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.41(f), the inventorship of an international design application designating the United States is the creator or creators…
Read More