What are the requirements for invoking the exception under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(B)?

To invoke the exception under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(B), certain requirements must be met. MPEP 2155.02 outlines these requirements: “In order for the exception under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(B) to apply, the subject matter of the intervening disclosure must be the same as the subject matter of the inventor’s previous public disclosure.” The key requirements…

Read More

How can an applicant show that a disclosure was made by the inventor before an intervening disclosure?

How can an applicant show that a disclosure was made by the inventor before an intervening disclosure? To show that a disclosure was made by the inventor before an intervening disclosure, the applicant must provide evidence that establishes the inventor’s prior public disclosure. The MPEP 2155.02 outlines several ways this can be done: An affidavit…

Read More

Does the manner of disclosure matter for invoking the 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(B) or 102(b)(2)(B) exceptions?

No, the manner or mode of disclosure is not critical when invoking the exceptions under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(B) or 102(b)(2)(B). The MPEP clarifies: “The manner of disclosure of subject matter referenced in an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.130(b) is not critical.” This means: The subject matter doesn’t need to be disclosed in the…

Read More

How do species and genus disclosures affect the application of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) exceptions?

The relationship between species and genus disclosures can significantly affect the application of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) exceptions. The MPEP provides guidance on different scenarios: Inventor discloses species, intervening disclosure is genus: “If the inventor or a joint inventor had publicly disclosed a species, and a subsequent intervening U.S. patent, U.S. patent application publication, or WIPO…

Read More

What does ‘same subject matter’ mean in the context of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(B) and 102(b)(2)(B) exceptions?

The concept of ‘same subject matter’ is crucial in applying the exceptions under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(B) and 102(b)(2)(B). According to the MPEP: “The exceptions of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(B) or 102(b)(2)(B) are only applicable when the subject matter of the intervening disclosure is the same as the subject matter of the earlier inventor-originated prior public disclosure.”…

Read More