How are finally refused or canceled claims treated in an interference?
According to MPEP 2304.01(d), finally refused or canceled claims are generally excluded from an interference proceeding. The MPEP states: “Claims which have been finally refused or canceled are generally excluded from the interference.” This treatment of finally refused or canceled claims serves several purposes: It streamlines the interference process by focusing on active, potentially patentable…
Read MoreHow can an inference of suppression or concealment be rebutted?
An inference of suppression or concealment can be rebutted by showing renewed activity on the invention just prior to the junior party’s entry into the field, coupled with diligent filing of a patent application. The MPEP provides several examples of activities that may rebut this inference: Showing activity directed to perfecting the invention Preparing the…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of filing a divisional application during an interference?
Filing a divisional application during an interference can serve as a strategic move to manage claims that may be affected by the interference while allowing other claims to proceed. The MPEP 2307.03 suggests this approach as a way to minimize the impact of suspension on patent term adjustment: “The applicant may then file a divisional…
Read MoreWho authorizes the entry of added or amended claims during an interference?
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is responsible for authorizing the entry of added or amended claims during an interference. According to MPEP 2308.02: “The examiner may enter the added claim or amended claim into the application only if, and only to the extent, authorized by the Board, typically in the decision on the…
Read MoreWhat happens to added or amended claims during an interference?
When claims are added or amended during an interference, they are not immediately entered into the application. The MPEP 2308.02 explains: “A copy of the paper adding or amending the claim will be placed in the official record of the application, but not entered. A decision on the motion is entered in the official record…
Read MoreHow does a priority showing differ from a priority statement in interference proceedings?
A priority showing under 37 CFR 41.202(d)(1) is distinct from a priority statement under 37 CFR 41.204(a) in interference proceedings. The MPEP clarifies: “A priority showing under 37 CFR 41.202(d)(1), which is presented during examination, is not the same as a priority statement under 37 CFR 41.204(a), which is filed during an interference. A priority…
Read MoreWhat is a priority showing in patent interference proceedings?
A priority showing is a requirement under 37 CFR 41.202(d)(1) when an applicant’s earliest constructive reduction to practice is later than that of a patent or published application claiming interfering subject matter. The MPEP states: “Whenever the application has an earliest constructive reduction-to-practice that is later than the earliest constructive reduction-to-practice of a published application…
Read MoreHow does the pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g)(1) affect patent rights in interference proceedings?
The pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g)(1) affects patent rights in interference proceedings by establishing conditions under which a person may not be entitled to a patent. According to MPEP 2301.01: “A person shall be entitled to a patent unless — (g)(1) during the course of an interference conducted under section 135 or section 291, another inventor…
Read MoreCan a patentee suggest an interference?
No, a patentee cannot directly suggest an interference. According to MPEP 2304.03, “A patentee cannot suggest an interference under this section“. However, there are limited options available to patentees: A patentee may file a reissue application to become an applicant, which would then allow them to suggest an interference. Alternatively, a patentee may, to a…
Read MoreHow can a patentee add or amend claims during an interference?
A patentee can add or amend claims during an interference by filing a reissue application. According to MPEP 2308.02: “A patentee may file a reissue application in support of a motion to add or amend a claim.” This process allows patentees to modify their claims in response to issues raised during the interference proceeding, potentially…
Read More