How does the MPEP address chemical composition claims?

How does the MPEP address chemical composition claims? The MPEP addresses chemical composition claims in MPEP 2112.01, stating: “Products of identical chemical composition can not have mutually exclusive properties.” This principle is crucial for chemical composition claims. It means that if two products have the same chemical makeup, they must inherently possess the same properties.…

Read More

How does the doctrine of inherent disclosure affect written description requirements?

The doctrine of inherent disclosure can significantly impact the written description requirements for patent applications. As stated in MPEP 2163.07(a): “Under the doctrine of inherent disclosure, when a specification describes an invention that has certain undisclosed yet inherent properties, that specification serves as adequate written description to support a subsequent patent application that explicitly recites…

Read More

What is the doctrine of inherent disclosure in patent law?

The doctrine of inherent disclosure in patent law refers to the principle that a patent application may implicitly disclose certain functions, theories, or advantages of an invention, even if they are not explicitly stated. As explained in MPEP 2163.07(a): “Under the doctrine of inherent disclosure, when a specification describes an invention that has certain undisclosed…

Read More

What is the relationship between a chemical composition and its properties in patent law?

In patent law, a chemical composition and its properties are considered inseparable. This principle is outlined in MPEP 2112.01(II): “Products of identical chemical composition can not have mutually exclusive properties.” In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 709, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1658 (Fed. Cir. 1990). The MPEP further explains: “A chemical composition and its properties are…

Read More

Can I amend my patent application to include inherent functions or properties?

Yes, you can amend your patent application to include inherent functions, theories, or advantages of your invention without introducing prohibited new matter. This is supported by MPEP 2163.07(a), which states: “The application may later be amended to recite the function, theory or advantage without introducing prohibited new matter.” This means that if your original application…

Read More

How are inherent properties considered in patent examinations?

Inherent properties play a significant role in patent examinations and can be crucial in establishing non-obviousness. MPEP 716.02(f) cites the case of In re Zenitz, which states that “evidence that claimed compound minimized side effects of hypotensive activity must be considered because this undisclosed property would inherently flow from disclosed use as tranquilizer.” This means…

Read More