What is the difference between inherent and explicit disclosure in patents?

The main difference between inherent and explicit disclosure in patents lies in how the information is presented in the patent application. MPEP 2163.07(a) explains: “By disclosing in a patent application a device that inherently performs a function or has a property, operates according to a theory or has an advantage, a patent application necessarily discloses…

Read More

How does the doctrine of inherent disclosure affect written description requirements?

The doctrine of inherent disclosure can significantly impact the written description requirements for patent applications. As stated in MPEP 2163.07(a): “Under the doctrine of inherent disclosure, when a specification describes an invention that has certain undisclosed yet inherent properties, that specification serves as adequate written description to support a subsequent patent application that explicitly recites…

Read More

Can the written description requirement be satisfied by inherent disclosure?

Yes, the written description requirement can potentially be satisfied by inherent disclosure, but this approach has limitations and requires careful consideration. The MPEP 2163.01 provides guidance on this matter: “To establish inherency, the extrinsic evidence ‘must make clear that the missing descriptive matter is necessarily present in the thing described in the reference, and that…

Read More

How does inherent disclosure affect patent applications?

Inherent disclosure in patent applications allows for later amendments that explicitly state functions, theories, or advantages that were inherently present in the original disclosure. The MPEP Section 2163.07(a) explains: “By disclosing in a patent application a device that inherently performs a function or has a property, operates according to a theory or has an advantage,…

Read More

What is the doctrine of inherent disclosure in patent law?

The doctrine of inherent disclosure in patent law refers to the principle that a patent application may implicitly disclose certain functions, theories, or advantages of an invention, even if they are not explicitly stated. As explained in MPEP 2163.07(a): “Under the doctrine of inherent disclosure, when a specification describes an invention that has certain undisclosed…

Read More

What is the difference between new matter and inherent disclosure in patent applications?

What is the difference between new matter and inherent disclosure in patent applications? New matter and inherent disclosure are distinct concepts in patent law: New matter refers to information added to a patent application after its filing date that goes beyond the original disclosure. This is generally not allowed and can result in rejection. Inherent…

Read More