Why doesn’t the USPTO investigate duty of disclosure issues during patent examination?
The USPTO does not investigate duty of disclosure issues during patent examination for several reasons: Lack of appropriate tools: The USPTO lacks the necessary tools to effectively deal with these complex issues. Sensitive nature: Duty of disclosure and inequitable conduct are sensitive matters with potential significant impact on a patent. Judicial doctrine: Inequitable conduct is…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle protests involving fraud or inequitable conduct?
The USPTO has a specific approach to handling protests involving fraud or inequitable conduct. According to the MPEP, “This includes, of course, information indicating the presence of ‘fraud’ or ‘inequitable conduct’ or ‘violation of the duty of disclosure,’ which will be entered in the application file, generally without comment on the inequitable conduct issues raised…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle duty of disclosure and inequitable conduct issues?
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) generally does not handle duty of disclosure or inequitable conduct issues during the examination process. According to MPEP 2010, “It is the courts and not the Office that are in the best position to fashion an equitable remedy to fit the precise facts in those cases where…
Read MoreWhat types of information can be included in a patent protest?
A patent protest can include a wide range of information. According to the MPEP, “Submissions under 37 CFR 1.291 are not limited to prior art documents such as patents and publications, but are intended to include any information, which in the protestor’s opinion, would make or have made the grant of the patent improper.” This…
Read MoreWhat are the risks of using prophetic examples in patent applications?
While prophetic examples can be valuable in patent applications, they also come with certain risks that applicants should be aware of: Potential for Inequitable Conduct: If prophetic examples are not clearly distinguished from working examples, it could be seen as an attempt to mislead the USPTO. Enablement Challenges: Overly speculative or implausible prophetic examples may…
Read MoreCan a reissue application be used to correct inequitable conduct?
Can a reissue application be used to correct inequitable conduct? No, a reissue application cannot be used to correct inequitable conduct. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 2012 clearly states: “A reissue application cannot be employed to ‘repair’ the effect of inequitable conduct or other fraud perpetrated on the Office, despite claims to the…
Read MoreWhat types of information from litigation are considered material to patent examination?
According to MPEP 2001.06(c), several types of information from litigation are considered material to patent examination: Evidence of possible prior public use or sales Questions of inventorship Prior art references Allegations of fraud, inequitable conduct, or violation of duty of disclosure Assertions made during litigation that contradict statements made to the examiner Defenses raised against…
Read MoreWhat issues can arise from improperly presented prophetic examples?
Improperly presented prophetic examples in patent applications can lead to serious issues, including questions about the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure, and potential inequitable conduct charges. The MPEP 2164.02 warns: “When prophetic examples are described in a manner that is ambiguous or that implies that the results are actual, the adequacy and accuracy of…
Read MoreHow are inequitable conduct issues addressed in the patent system?
Inequitable conduct issues in the patent system are primarily addressed by the courts rather than the USPTO. According to MPEP 2010: “It is the courts and not the Office that are in the best position to fashion an equitable remedy to fit the precise facts in those cases where inequitable conduct is established.” The MPEP…
Read MoreCan a protestor submit information about potential inequitable conduct in a protest?
Yes, a protestor can submit information about potential inequitable conduct in a protest. MPEP 1901.02 explicitly states: “Information which can be relied on in a protest… includes information indicating that fraud or inequitable conduct is or was involved in the prosecution of a patent or patent application.” This means that if a protestor has knowledge…
Read More