TwitterLinkedinSkypeRssEmail
+1.970.776.4355
BlueIron IP
  • About
  • IP-Backed Loans
  • Blog
  • All FAQs
    • Patent Loans
    • Patent Law FAQ
  • Contact
  • Schedule a Call

What is the significance of the In re Grose case in patent examination?

By russ.krajec@blueironip.com | September 29, 2024

The In re Grose case, cited in MPEP 2144.02, is significant in patent examination because it demonstrates the limitations of applying structural obviousness to complex mixtures. The MPEP states: “In re Grose, 592 F.2d 1161, 201 USPQ 57 (CCPA 1979) (Court held that different crystal forms of zeolites would not have been structurally obvious one…

Read More

Search

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Stolen Valor: How Sleazy Patent Attorneys Abuse Inventorship
  • Four Horsemen of the Investor Apocalypse
  • AI-Assisted Patent Search Tools Exacerbate Inventor Biases
  • Your Patent Attorney Is NOT Giving Business Advice
  • Contempt from Crowdfunded Equity
  • Entrepreneurs and Imposter Syndrome
  • AI Startups: Protect Everything EXCEPT the Patent
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Media Kit
BlueIron IP | 1635 Foxtrail Drive, Ste 321 | Loveland, Colorado 80538 | USA