What is the key consideration when analyzing obviousness of species claims?
The key consideration is whether the claimed species or subgenus would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the pertinent art at the relevant time. As stated in MPEP 2144.08: “The patentability of a claim to a specific compound, species, or subgenus embraced by a prior art genus should be analyzed no differently…
Read MoreHow does conception of a species relate to conception of a genus in patent law?
The relationship between conception of a species and conception of a genus in patent law is complex and nuanced. According to MPEP 2138.04: “The first to conceive of a species is not necessarily the first to conceive of the generic invention. In re Jolley, 308 F.3d 1317, 1323 n.2, 64 USPQ2d 1901, 1905 n.2 (Fed.…
Read MoreWhat happens if subcombinations are both species under a claimed genus and related?
When subcombinations are both species under a claimed genus and related, the question of restriction becomes more complex. MPEP 806.05(d) provides guidance on this situation: “Where subcombinations as disclosed and claimed are both (a) species under a claimed genus and (b) related, then the question of restriction must be determined by both the practice applicable…
Read MoreWhat is a genus and species invention in patent law?
In patent law, a genus invention refers to a broader category or group of inventions, while species inventions are specific embodiments or variations within that genus. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 806.04 states: “Where an application includes claims directed to different embodiments or species that could fall within the scope of a generic…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between species and embodiments in patent applications?
In patent applications, the terms “species” and “embodiments” are often used interchangeably, but they have subtle differences: Embodiments: Refer to specific examples or implementations of the invention described in the application. Species: Typically represent distinct variations or sub-types within a broader inventive concept (genus). The MPEP 808.01(a) states: “Where an application includes claims directed to…
Read More