Can a claim be revived after an interference judgment?
Generally, a claim that has been subject to an adverse interference judgment cannot be revived in its current form. The MPEP 2308.01 is clear on this point: “Judgment against a claim in an interference, including any judgment on priority or patentability, finally disposes of the claim.” This finality means that the claim, as judged in…
Read MoreHow does an interference judgment affect a patent claim?
An interference judgment has a significant impact on a patent claim. According to MPEP 2308.01, “Judgment against a claim in an interference, including any judgment on priority or patentability, finally disposes of the claim.” This means that once a judgment is rendered against a claim in an interference proceeding, that claim is effectively terminated and…
Read MoreWhat is the USPTO’s strategy for efficient patent examination?
The USPTO emphasizes efficiency in the patent examination process. According to MPEP 707.02: The supervisory patent examiners should impress upon their assistants that the shortest path to the final disposition of an application is by finding the best references on the first search and carefully applying them. This guidance underscores the importance of conducting thorough…
Read More