How does an examiner determine if the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception applies?

An examiner determines if the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception applies by following specific procedures outlined in the MPEP. The key steps include: Reviewing the application and prior art for potential applicability of the exception Considering any statements or evidence provided by the applicant regarding common ownership Evaluating the timing of common ownership in relation…

Read More

How should an examiner handle non-compliant IDSs?

How should an examiner handle non-compliant IDSs? When an examiner encounters a non-compliant Information Disclosure Statement (IDS), they should follow these steps: Identify the specific non-compliance issue(s). Return the IDS to the applicant or patent owner. Provide a Notice of Non-Compliant Information Disclosure Statement (PTO-1449). Explain the reason(s) for non-compliance in the notice. Do not…

Read More

What should examiners do if drawings are inconsistent with the specification in a patent application?

If examiners find that drawings are inconsistent with the specification in a patent application, they should: Identify the specific inconsistencies Object to the drawings and/or specification as appropriate Provide clear explanations of the inconsistencies in the Office action Require the applicant to correct the inconsistencies MPEP 608.02(e) states: ‘The examiner should see to it that…

Read More

How should examiners handle informal drawings in patent applications?

Examiners should handle informal drawings in patent applications as follows: Determine if the drawings are sufficient for examination purposes If sufficient, proceed with examination but note the need for formal drawings If insufficient, object to the drawings and explain why formal drawings are required According to MPEP 608.02(e): ‘The acceptance of and retention of informal…

Read More

How does an examiner process documents submitted as evidence in a reply to an Office action?

When an applicant submits documents as evidence in a reply to an Office action, the examiner is not required to process these documents as items of information cited in an information disclosure statement. The MPEP clarifies: “The record should reflect whether the evidence was considered, but listing on a form (e.g., PTO-892 or PTO/SB/08) and…

Read More