How does the USPTO process international design applications designating the United States?
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) processes international design applications designating the United States as follows: The USPTO examines the application according to U.S. law, as stated in 35 U.S.C. 389(a). No additional submissions are required from the applicant to initiate examination. Published international design registrations designating the U.S. are automatically received from…
Read MoreHow are proposed amendments treated in the decision on a reexamination request?
When a patent owner includes proposed amendments with a reexamination request, the decision on the request is made based on the original patent claims, not the proposed amendments. MPEP 2221 states: “The request should be decided on the wording of the patent claims in effect at that time (without any proposed amendments). The decision on…
Read MoreWhat happens to a patent application during an interference proceeding?
During an interference proceeding, the normal examination process for the involved patent application is generally suspended. The MPEP 2301 states: “Once the interference is declared, the examiner generally will not treat the application again until the interference has been terminated.” However, there are exceptions: The Board may refer matters back to the examiner The Board…
Read MoreWhat is the process for issuing Office actions in international design applications?
The process for issuing Office actions in international design applications is outlined in MPEP 2920.05(f). The key points are: “The examiner should issue an Office action if deficiencies are found during examination. The Office action should clearly set forth all requirements that must be met for the application to be in condition for allowance.” Office…
Read MoreCan the Board assume jurisdiction before an application is ready for allowance?
Yes, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) has the authority to assume jurisdiction over a patent application at any stage of the examination process. The MPEP 2312 explicitly states: “In an application this jurisdictional assumption may occur at any time, including before the application is otherwise in condition for allowance.” This means that…
Read MoreHow does the two-month delay period affect the examination of reissue applications?
The two-month delay period affects the examination of reissue applications by providing a window for public review before the USPTO takes action. According to MPEP § 1441: The 2-month delay is provided in order that members of the public may have time to review the reissue application and submit pertinent information to the Office before…
Read MoreWhat precautions should examiners take when conducting internet searches?
Examiners should take the following precautions when conducting internet searches: Use only USPTO-provided internet search tools and databases Avoid entering sensitive data into non-USPTO websites Be cautious of potentially offensive content The MPEP advises: “In using the Internet, the examiner should be aware that Internet sites may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code or…
Read MoreCan patent examiners discuss specific evidence considered during examination?
No, patent examiners are not allowed to discuss specific evidence considered during the examination process with individuals outside the USPTO. The MPEP 1701 states: “Employees of the USPTO, particularly patent examiners who examined an application which matured into a patent or a reissued patent or who conducted a reexamination proceeding, should not discuss or answer…
Read MoreWhat is the effect of canceling claims to all but one invention in a patent application?
Canceling claims to all but one invention in a patent application has the effect of electing that remaining invention for examination. According to MPEP 818.02(c): “Where applicant claims two or more independent or distinct inventions and as a result of amendment to the claims, he or she cancels the claims to one or more of…
Read MoreWhat are the consequences of reopening prosecution after appeal in a patent application?
Reopening prosecution after appeal in a patent application can have several consequences: Withdrawal of the appeal: The appeal is automatically withdrawn when prosecution is reopened. New Office action: The examiner must issue a new Office action addressing all claims on appeal. Additional prosecution: The applicant may need to respond to new rejections or arguments, potentially…
Read More