How are continuation-in-part (CIP) applications handled in terms of examination order?

Continuation-in-part (CIP) applications have a unique treatment when it comes to examination order. The MPEP provides guidance on this: “The actual filing date of a continuation-in-part application is used for docketing purposes. However, the examiner may act on a continuation-in-part application by using the effective filing date, if desired.” This means that while CIP applications…

Read More

What is the effective filing date for prior art exceptions under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C)?

What is the effective filing date for prior art exceptions under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C)? The effective filing date for prior art exceptions under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) is crucial for determining the applicability of the exception. According to MPEP 717.02(a): “The effective filing date of a claimed invention is determined on a claim-by-claim basis and not…

Read More

What is the significance of the effective filing date in invoking the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception?

What is the significance of the effective filing date in invoking the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception? The effective filing date plays a crucial role in invoking the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception. According to MPEP 717.02(b): “The effective filing date is the filing date of the earliest application for which the application is entitled…

Read More

What is the significance of the effective filing date in AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exceptions?

What is the significance of the effective filing date in AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exceptions? The effective filing date plays a crucial role in determining the applicability of the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception. According to MPEP 717.02(c): “Even if the reference is not disqualified as prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C), the reference…

Read More