When is a new oath or declaration required in a patent application?

A new oath or declaration is required in a patent application under the following circumstances: When filing a continuation or divisional application When filing a continuation-in-part application To correct inventorship in an application When the original oath or declaration was defective According to MPEP 602.02: ‘A new oath or declaration is required in a continuation…

Read More

When is a divisional application typically filed?

A divisional application is often filed in response to a restriction requirement made by the patent examiner. As stated in the MPEP: A divisional application is often filed as a result of a restriction requirement made by the examiner. When an examiner determines that an application contains multiple independent and distinct inventions, they may issue…

Read More

Are new oaths or declarations required for continuation or divisional applications?

For continuation or divisional applications filed before September 16, 2012, a new oath or declaration is generally not required if certain conditions are met. According to pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.63(d): A newly executed oath or declaration is not required under § 1.51(b)(2) and § 1.53(f) in a continuation or divisional application, provided that: The prior…

Read More

What are the requirements for filing a continuation or divisional application before September 16, 2012?

For continuation or divisional applications filed before September 16, 2012 under 37 CFR 1.53(b) (excluding continuation-in-part applications), applicants could file using a copy of the oath or declaration from the prior nonprovisional application. This is supported by the MPEP, which states: “A continuation or divisional application filed before September 16, 2012 under 37 CFR 1.53(b)…

Read More

How were continuation or divisional applications handled when a petition under 37 CFR 1.48 was filed in the prior application?

When a petition under 37 CFR 1.48 to add an inventor was filed in a prior application, the continuation or divisional application could be handled in one of two ways: Filed with a copy of the executed declaration naming the correct inventive entity from the prior application. Filed with a newly executed declaration naming the…

Read More

How are continuation or divisional applications filed after December 1, 1997 treated?

According to the MPEP, A continuation or divisional application filed under 37 CFR 1.60 on or after December 1, 1997, will automatically be treated as an application filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b). This means that any continuation or divisional application filed after this date is processed under the new regulations, specifically 37 CFR 1.53(b), regardless…

Read More

What is the difference between a continuation and a divisional application?

A continuation application and a divisional application are both types of continuing applications, but they serve different purposes: Continuation application: Used to pursue additional claims to an invention disclosed in a prior application. It contains the same disclosure as the parent application. Divisional application: Used to pursue claims to an invention that was disclosed but…

Read More

How should the correspondence address be handled in continuation or divisional applications?

Special attention is required when dealing with the correspondence address in continuation or divisional applications. According to MPEP 601.03(b): “Special care should be taken in continuation or divisional applications to ensure that any change of correspondence address in a prior application is reflected in the continuation or divisional application.” The MPEP further explains that when…

Read More