What happens if there’s a dispute over the classification of a design application?

When there’s a dispute over the classification of a design application in the USPTO, the following process is followed: Examiners attempt to reach an agreement on the classification and assignment. If no agreement is reached, the transfer request is forwarded to the supervisors of the originating and receiving examiners. If supervisors can’t agree, the request…

Read More

How are disagreements on classification handled in Patentability Reports?

When there’s a disagreement on classification in relation to a Patentability Report, the MPEP provides a clear process: ‘Conflict of opinion as to classification may be referred to a classification dispute TC representative panel for decision.’ This means that if examiners from different Technology Centers disagree on how to classify an application, they can seek…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle conflicting instructions from multiple assignees?

When the USPTO receives conflicting instructions from multiple assignees or co-inventors regarding a patent application, it follows a specific protocol to ensure fair treatment of all parties. According to MPEP 106, the USPTO will not arbitrate disputes between the parties. In such cases, the USPTO typically: Suspends action on the application until the conflict is…

Read More