How does double inclusion affect device claims in patents?
Double inclusion in device claims can potentially lead to indefiniteness issues. The MPEP 2173.05(o) provides specific guidance on this matter: “On the other hand, where a claim directed to a device can be read to include the same element twice, the claim may be indefinite.” The MPEP cites the case of Ex parte Kristensen to…
Read MoreHow does double inclusion affect claim indefiniteness?
Double inclusion can potentially affect claim indefiniteness, but it doesn’t automatically render a claim indefinite. According to MPEP 2173.05(o): “The facts in each case must be evaluated to determine whether or not the multiple inclusion of one or more elements in a claim gives rise to indefiniteness in that claim.” The MPEP provides examples to…
Read More