What evidence is required in a 37 CFR 1.130(a) declaration?

A 37 CFR 1.130(a) declaration requires evidence to establish that the disclosure was made by the inventor or joint inventor, or that the subject matter was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or joint inventor. The evidence may include: Inventor’s affidavit or declaration stating the facts Corroborating documents (e.g., emails, lab notebooks) Evidence of…

Read More

What is the difference between derivation and priority of invention?

While both derivation and priority of invention relate to inventorship, they focus on different aspects. The MPEP explains this distinction clearly: Although derivation and priority of invention both focus on inventorship, derivation addresses originality (i.e., who invented the subject matter), whereas priority focuses on which party first invented the subject matter. In other words: Derivation…

Read More

What evidence is required to prove derivation under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(f)?

Proving derivation under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(f) requires specific evidence. The MPEP outlines the key requirements: Complete Conception: There must be evidence of complete conception by another person. The MPEP states: Derivation requires complete conception by another and communication of that conception by any means to the party charged with derivation prior to any date…

Read More

When can a patent application be withdrawn from issue according to MPEP 1308.02?

According to MPEP 1308.02, a patent application can be withdrawn from issue when there are reasons related to interference or derivation proceedings. The section states: “It may be necessary to withdraw a case from issue for reasons connected with an interference or derivation.” This means that if an interference or derivation proceeding is initiated or…

Read More

What is the purpose of MPEP 1308.02?

MPEP 1308.02 addresses the need to withdraw a patent application from issue for reasons related to interference or derivation proceedings. The section states: “It may be necessary to withdraw a case from issue for reasons connected with an interference or derivation.” This brief section serves as a pointer to more detailed procedures found in MPEP…

Read More

How does MPEP 1308.02 relate to MPEP Chapter 2300?

MPEP 1308.02 serves as a brief reference point that directs readers to MPEP Chapter 2300 for more detailed information. The section states: “For the procedure to be followed, see MPEP Chapter 2300.” This means that while MPEP 1308.02 introduces the concept of withdrawing a patent application from issue due to interference or derivation proceedings, it…

Read More

Can a 37 CFR 1.131(a) affidavit be used to overcome all types of prior art references?

No, a 37 CFR 1.131(a) affidavit cannot be used to overcome all types of prior art references. The MPEP 715 outlines specific limitations on the use of these affidavits: U.S. Patents and Applications: Cannot be used against U.S. patents or published applications naming another inventor with an earlier effective filing date. Statutory Bars: Cannot overcome…

Read More

What is derivation in the context of pre-AIA patent law?

In the context of pre-AIA patent law, derivation refers to a situation where the subject matter in a patent, application publication, or other publication is derived from the inventor’s or at least one joint inventor’s own invention. MPEP 715.01(c) explains: When the unclaimed subject matter of a patent, application publication, or other publication is the…

Read More