What is the requirement for ‘lack of deceptive intention’ in reissue applications?

For reissue applications filed before September 16, 2012, there was a specific requirement regarding ‘lack of deceptive intention’. The MPEP states: For reissue applications filed prior to September 16, 2012, both pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 251 and pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.175 require that the reissue oath or declaration must state that the error arose “without any…

Read More

How can an applicant establish that a disclosure falls under the grace period inventor-originated disclosure exception?

An applicant can establish that a disclosure falls under the grace period inventor-originated disclosure exception in several ways: Apparent from the disclosure itself: If the disclosure was made one year or less before the effective filing date, names the inventor or a joint inventor as an author, and does not name additional persons as authors,…

Read More

What documentation should accompany an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.130?

When submitting an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.130 to show that another obtained the subject matter directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor, it’s important to include supporting documentation. The MPEP advises: “Any documentation which provides evidence of the communication of the subject matter by the inventor or a joint…

Read More

What is the significance of an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a) in overcoming a pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection?

An affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a) can be used to overcome a pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection by proving prior invention. However, it’s important to note that this method has limitations. The MPEP states: “An affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a) can overcome a prior art rejection under pre‑AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e)…

Read More