How is correspondence handled when multiple parties are prosecuting a patent application?

When multiple parties are prosecuting a patent application, the USPTO has specific procedures for handling correspondence. The MPEP states: “Double correspondence will still not be permitted. Accordingly, when the acceptance of such papers results in an attorney or agent and at least one applicant or owner prosecuting the application, correspondence will be mailed to the…

Read More

What are the signature requirements for correspondence in patent applications?

The signature requirements for correspondence in patent applications are outlined in MPEP 502.02. The section states: 37 CFR 1.4(d) sets forth the signature requirements for correspondence filed in the Office. Specifically, 37 CFR 1.4(d) provides that: The signature requirements vary depending on the type of correspondence and the method of submission. Generally, they include: Handwritten…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle correspondence for juristic entities in patent applications?

For juristic entities (e.g., corporations, organizations), the USPTO has specific requirements for correspondence and signatures. According to 37 CFR 1.33(b)(3): Unless otherwise specified, all papers submitted on behalf of a juristic entity must be signed by a patent practitioner. This means that: A juristic entity must prosecute a patent application through a registered patent practitioner.…

Read More