How does confidentiality work with CPAs?

Confidentiality in Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) is handled differently from standard applications. Filing a CPA includes a waiver of confidentiality to some extent: The CPA is construed to include a waiver of confidentiality under 35 U.S.C. 122 This waiver allows public access to both the prior application and any continuing applications filed under 37 CFR…

Read More

How are CPAs different from RCEs?

Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) and Requests for Continued Examination (RCEs) are both methods to continue prosecution of an application, but they have significant differences: CPAs are only available for design patent applications, while RCEs can be used for utility, plant, and design applications CPAs result in a new application with the same application number, while…

Read More

What happens if an improper CPA is filed?

When an improper Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) is filed, the USPTO’s response depends on the type of application and the nature of the impropriety: For utility or plant applications filed on or after July 14, 2003, an improper CPA is treated as a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) if possible If the improper CPA doesn’t…

Read More

What are the signature requirements for filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA)?

The signature requirements for filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) are specific and important. According to MPEP 201.06(d): A Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) filed under 37 CFR 1.53(d) must be signed by a person authorized to prosecute the application, except as provided in 37 CFR 1.33(b). This means that: The CPA must be signed by…

Read More

What types of applications can be filed as a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA)?

A Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) can be filed for specific types of applications. According to MPEP 201.06(d): Effective July 14, 2003, CPA practice under 37 CFR 1.53(d) is not available for utility and plant applications. This means that CPAs are limited to: Design applications: Applications for design patents can be filed as CPAs. Continuation applications:…

Read More

How does the inventorship in a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) relate to the parent application?

The inventorship in a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) is directly related to the parent application. As stated in MPEP 201.06(d): ‘The inventorship in a CPA filed under 37 CFR 1.53(d) is the same as in the prior application.’ This means that when you file a CPA, you are essentially continuing the same application with the…

Read More