What happens to cited references in continuation applications?

For continuation applications, the treatment of cited references differs from new applications. According to MPEP 707.05(a): Additionally, copies of references cited in continuation applications if they had been previously cited in the parent application are not furnished. However, if no new art is cited in the continuation application, the MPEP states: In the rare instance…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle new matter in continuation applications?

How does the USPTO handle new matter in continuation applications? The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) treats new matter in continuation applications similarly to how it handles new matter in original applications. According to MPEP 608.04: “A continuation application cannot include new matter. Applicant is required to delete the benefit claim or change…

Read More

What is a divisional application?

A divisional application is a later application for an independent or distinct invention, carved out of a nonprovisional application. It discloses and claims only subject matter disclosed in the earlier or parent application. As stated in MPEP 201.06: A later application for an independent or distinct invention, carved out of a nonprovisional application (including a…

Read More

How does copendency affect benefit claims between applications?

Copendency is a crucial requirement for claiming benefit between nonprovisional applications. The later-filed application must be filed before: The patenting of the prior application The abandonment of the prior application The termination of proceedings in the prior application As stated in MPEP 211.01(b): When a later-filed application is claiming the benefit of a prior-filed nonprovisional…

Read More

How does a divisional application affect the patent term?

A divisional application does not extend the patent term beyond that of the parent application. The term of a patent issuing from a divisional application is calculated from the filing date of the earliest application for which a benefit is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c), excluding any benefit claims to provisional…

Read More

What happened to 37 CFR 1.60 regarding divisional and continuation applications?

37 CFR 1.60, which previously governed the filing of divisional and continuation applications, was deleted effective December 1, 1997. As stated in the MPEP, 37 CFR 1.60 was deleted effective December 1, 1997. See 1203 O.G. 63, October 21, 1997. This change significantly impacted the procedure for filing these types of applications. For more information…

Read More

Are Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) available for all types of patent applications?

No, Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) are not available for all types of patent applications. They are specifically limited to design patent applications. This is evident from the MPEP guidance, which states: ‘Use this form paragraph to inform applicant that a request for a CPA in a design application is not in compliance with 37 CFR…

Read More