How does express abandonment affect continuation applications?
How does express abandonment affect continuation applications? Express abandonment of a parent application can have significant implications for continuation applications. According to MPEP 711.01: ‘Applicants and their attorneys should be careful not to expressly abandon applications that are the parents of continuation applications where the parent application is to be abandoned in favor of the…
Read MoreWhat happens to cited references in continuation applications?
For continuation applications, the treatment of cited references differs from new applications. According to MPEP 707.05(a): Additionally, copies of references cited in continuation applications if they had been previously cited in the parent application are not furnished. However, if no new art is cited in the continuation application, the MPEP states: In the rare instance…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle new matter in continuation applications?
How does the USPTO handle new matter in continuation applications? The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) treats new matter in continuation applications similarly to how it handles new matter in original applications. According to MPEP 608.04: “A continuation application cannot include new matter. Applicant is required to delete the benefit claim or change…
Read MoreWhat is a divisional application?
A divisional application is a later application for an independent or distinct invention, carved out of a nonprovisional application. It discloses and claims only subject matter disclosed in the earlier or parent application. As stated in MPEP 201.06: A later application for an independent or distinct invention, carved out of a nonprovisional application (including a…
Read MoreHow does continuity relate to copendency in patent applications?
Continuity in patent applications refers to the relationship of copendency of the same subject matter in two different applications naming the same inventor or at least one joint inventor in common. The MPEP 211.01(b) states: “The term ‘continuity’ is used to express the relationship of copendency of the same subject matter in two different applications…
Read MoreHow does copendency affect benefit claims between applications?
Copendency is a crucial requirement for claiming benefit between nonprovisional applications. The later-filed application must be filed before: The patenting of the prior application The abandonment of the prior application The termination of proceedings in the prior application As stated in MPEP 211.01(b): When a later-filed application is claiming the benefit of a prior-filed nonprovisional…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for filing a divisional application?
The key requirements for filing a divisional application include: The divisional application must be filed before the patenting or abandonment of the parent application. It must claim only subject matter disclosed in the parent application. It must be filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b) (or 37 CFR 1.53(d) if it is a design application). The inventorship…
Read MoreHow does a divisional application affect the patent term?
A divisional application does not extend the patent term beyond that of the parent application. The term of a patent issuing from a divisional application is calculated from the filing date of the earliest application for which a benefit is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c), excluding any benefit claims to provisional…
Read MoreWhat happened to 37 CFR 1.60 regarding divisional and continuation applications?
37 CFR 1.60, which previously governed the filing of divisional and continuation applications, was deleted effective December 1, 1997. As stated in the MPEP, 37 CFR 1.60 was deleted effective December 1, 1997. See 1203 O.G. 63, October 21, 1997. This change significantly impacted the procedure for filing these types of applications. For more information…
Read MoreAre Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) available for all types of patent applications?
No, Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) are not available for all types of patent applications. They are specifically limited to design patent applications. This is evident from the MPEP guidance, which states: ‘Use this form paragraph to inform applicant that a request for a CPA in a design application is not in compliance with 37 CFR…
Read More