What does “mere instructions to apply an exception” mean in patent eligibility?
“Mere instructions to apply an exception” refers to claim elements that do not integrate a judicial exception (such as an abstract idea) into a practical application or provide significantly more than the exception itself. The Supreme Court has clarified that to be patent-eligible, claims must do “‘more than simply stat[e] the [judicial exception] while adding…
Read MoreHow does the Intellectual Ventures I v. Capital One Bank case relate to mere instructions to apply an exception?
The Intellectual Ventures I v. Capital One Bank case provides an important example of how courts evaluate claims that may amount to mere instructions to apply an exception. According to MPEP 2106.05(f): “In Intellectual Ventures I v. Capital One Bank, the claims recited a system for providing web pages tailored to an individual user, comprising…
Read MoreWhat are examples of “applying it” with a computer in patent claims?
Examples of “applying it” with a computer in patent claims, which may indicate mere instructions to apply an exception, include: Using a computer or other machinery in its ordinary capacity for economic or other tasks (e.g., to receive, store, or transmit data) Adding the words “apply it” (or an equivalent) with the judicial exception, or…
Read MoreHow does the use of a computer in a claim affect the “mere instructions to apply” analysis?
The use of a computer in a claim does not automatically make the claim eligible or ineligible. According to MPEP 2106.05(f), the key consideration is how the computer is used in the claim: “Use of a computer or other machinery in its ordinary capacity for economic or other tasks (e.g., to receive, store, or transmit…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International for patent eligibility?
The Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International case is a landmark decision that significantly impacted the evaluation of patent eligibility, particularly for computer-implemented inventions. According to MPEP 2106.05(f): “In Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, the claim recited a computer system as a tool for implementing a method of mitigating ‘settlement risk’. The Court concluded…
Read More