What does “reasonable notice” mean in the context of attorney withdrawal from patent proceedings?
In the context of attorney withdrawal from patent proceedings, “reasonable notice” is not strictly defined by a specific time period. According to MPEP 2623: “‘Reasonable notice’ would allow a reasonable amount of time for the client to seek the services of another practitioner prior to the expiration of any applicable response period.” This means that…
Read MoreWhat information must an attorney provide to a client when withdrawing from a patent proceeding?
When withdrawing from a patent proceeding, an attorney must provide specific information to the client. As per MPEP 2223, the practitioner must certify that they have: “notified the client of any responses that may be due and the time frame within which the client must respond.” This requirement ensures that the client is aware of…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for an attorney or agent to withdraw from a patent reexamination proceeding?
According to MPEP 2623, for a practitioner to withdraw from a patent and/or reexamination proceeding, they must comply with 37 CFR 11.116. The practitioner(s) must certify that they have: Given reasonable notice to the client, prior to the expiration of the response period, of their intention to withdraw from employment Delivered all papers and property…
Read MoreWhat information must an attorney provide to a client about pending responses when withdrawing from a patent case?
When withdrawing from a patent case, an attorney or agent has specific obligations regarding pending responses. According to MPEP 2623, the practitioner must certify that they have: “notified the client of any responses that may be due and the time frame within which the client must respond.” This requirement ensures that the client is aware…
Read More