How are national security classified patent applications handled by the USPTO?

National security classified patent applications require special handling by the USPTO. The MPEP states that: National security classified documents filed in the USPTO must be either hand-carried to Licensing and Review or mailed to the Office in compliance with37 CFR 5.1(a)and Executive Order 13526 of December 29, 2009. However, the USPTO has made provisions for…

Read More

How does the copendency requirement affect claiming benefit of a prior application?

How does the copendency requirement affect claiming benefit of a prior application? The copendency requirement is a critical factor in claiming the benefit of a prior application. MPEP 211.01(b) states: To be entitled to the benefit of the filing date of an earlier-filed application, the later-filed application must be copending with the earlier application. Copendency…

Read More

What is the difference between a ‘country’ and a ‘regional patent office’ in the context of foreign priority claims?

In the context of foreign priority claims, there’s an important distinction between a ‘country’ and a ‘regional patent office’: Country: A sovereign nation that has its own patent system and can issue patents directly. Regional Patent Office: An intergovernmental organization that processes patent applications on behalf of multiple member countries. The MPEP states: The right…

Read More

What is the PDX program for patent applications?

The Priority Document Exchange (PDX) program is an electronic system that allows participating intellectual property offices to exchange priority documents securely. According to MPEP 215.01, “Under the PDX program, the participating offices electronically transmit priority documents to each other as needed.” This program eliminates the need for applicants to submit paper certified copies of priority…

Read More

What is the ‘same invention’ requirement for claiming benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120?

What is the ‘same invention’ requirement for claiming benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120? The ‘same invention’ requirement is a crucial aspect of claiming benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120. MPEP 211.01(b) explains: The second application must be an application for a patent for an invention which is also disclosed in the first application. This means: The…

Read More

What is the ‘specific reference’ requirement for claiming benefit of a prior-filed application?

What is the ‘specific reference’ requirement for claiming benefit of a prior-filed application? The ‘specific reference’ requirement is a crucial aspect of claiming the benefit of a prior-filed application. According to MPEP 211.01, To claim the benefit of a prior-filed application, the later-filed application must contain a specific reference to the prior-filed application. This means…

Read More