What should examiners consider when reviewing dependent claims?
When examining dependent claims, patent examiners have specific considerations. The MPEP 2173.05(f) states: “When examining a dependent claim, the examiner should also determine whether the claim complies with 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph.” This means that examiners must ensure that dependent claims properly incorporate all limitations of the claim(s) they…
Read MoreWhat is an example of a formal objection in patent examination?
The MPEP provides a clear example of a formal objection in patent examination: An example of a matter of form as to which objection is made is dependency of a claim on a rejected claim, if the dependent claim is otherwise allowable. This example illustrates that objections typically relate to the form or structure of…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for proper dependency in multiple dependent claims?
What are the requirements for proper dependency in multiple dependent claims? Multiple dependent claims must meet specific requirements for proper dependency: They must refer back to previous claims in the alternative only. A multiple dependent claim cannot serve as a basis for any other multiple dependent claim. They must be written in a form that…
Read More