What happens to rejected claims if a patent owner fails to respond to an Office action in inter partes reexamination?
When a patent owner fails to respond to an Office action in inter partes reexamination, the fate of rejected claims depends on whether any claims were found patentable. According to MPEP 2666.10: If no claims were found patentable, all claims under rejection will be canceled upon issuance of the reexamination certificate. If at least one…
Read MoreWhen might a patent title change be necessary during reexamination?
While patent title changes during reexamination are rare, there are situations where they might be necessary. The MPEP 2660.02 provides an example: “An example of a situation where it would be appropriate to change the title is where all the claims directed to one of the categories of invention (in the patent) are canceled via…
Read MoreHow are new claims numbered in patent reexamination?
Numbering of new claims in patent reexamination follows these rules: Original patent claims retain their numbers, even if canceled. New claims are numbered sequentially starting after the last original patent claim number. If new claims are canceled, their numbers are not reused for other new claims. At the time of the Notice of Intent to…
Read MoreWhat happens if all patent claims are canceled in an Inter Partes Reexamination?
If all patent claims are canceled as a result of an inter partes reexamination, the USPTO will issue a certificate reflecting this outcome. According to MPEP 2688: “If a certificate issues which cancels all of the claims of the patent, no further Office proceedings will be conducted with regard to that patent or any reissue…
Read MoreWhat happens if all patent claims are canceled in an Ex Parte Reexamination?
If all patent claims are canceled as a result of an ex parte reexamination, it has significant consequences for the patent and any related proceedings. According to MPEP 2288: “If an ex parte reexamination certificate has been issued and published which cancels all of the claims of the patent, no further Office proceedings will be…
Read MoreWhat happens when all claims are canceled in an inter partes reexamination proceeding?
When all claims in an inter partes reexamination proceeding are to be canceled, the following process occurs: The examiner issues a Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate (NIRC) indicating that all claims have been canceled and terminating the prosecution. An examiner’s amendment is drafted as an attachment to the NIRC, canceling all…
Read MoreHow can an applicant withdraw appealed claims?
An applicant can withdraw appealed claims by submitting an amendment that cancels those claims. The MPEP 1215.02 provides guidance on this: “An amendment canceling the appealed claims is equivalent to a withdrawal of the appeal.” This means that if you want to withdraw your appeal for specific claims, you can simply file an amendment canceling…
Read MoreWhat happens to claims that are not appealed in a patent application?
Claims that are not appealed in a patent application may be cancelled. According to MPEP 1214.05, “Where, in an appeal brief filed before January 23, 2012, an appellant withdraws some of the appealed claims (i.e., claims subject to a ground of rejection that the appellant did not present for review in the brief), and the…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of MPEP 1302.04(d) in relation to interference proceedings?
MPEP 1302.04(d) serves as a brief reference point for examiners and patent practitioners regarding the cancellation of claims lost in interference. The section states: “Cancellation of Claim Lost in Interference [R-08.2012] See MPEP Chapter 2300.” While this section doesn’t provide detailed information, its significance lies in directing readers to the more comprehensive MPEP Chapter 2300…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of MPEP 1302.04(c) in patent examination?
MPEP 1302.04(c) is a crucial section in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure that addresses the cancellation of claims to nonelected invention. Its significance lies in providing guidance to patent examiners and applicants on how to handle claims that were not chosen for examination due to a restriction requirement. The section states: “See MPEP §…
Read More