Is increasing the number of claims in a response considered not fully responsive?
Increasing the number of claims in a response to a second or subsequent non-final action on the merits is not, by itself, a reason to consider the response not fully responsive. The MPEP states: An amendment submitted after a second or subsequent non-final action on the merits which is otherwise responsive but which increases the…
Read MoreWhat is the general rule for entering amendments under 37 CFR 1.312?
The general rule is that an amendment cannot be entered in part and refused in part. However, there are exceptions to this rule. As stated in the MPEP, “when, under 37 CFR 1.312, an amendment, for example, is proposed containing a plurality of claims or amendments to claims, some of which may be entered and…
Read MoreCan an examiner suggest claim amendments during an interview prior to first official action?
Yes, an examiner can suggest claim amendments during an interview prior to the first official action. The MPEP 713.02 states: ‘In appropriate circumstances, the examiner may suggest a reasonable number of potential amendments which, if presented, would appear to overcome the apparent rejections. This may be done in the spirit of a constructive approach to…
Read MoreWhat should I include in my patent amendment to ensure it’s considered fully responsive?
To ensure your patent amendment is considered fully responsive, you should include several key elements. According to MPEP 714.04 and related sections, a fully responsive amendment should: Address all rejections and objections raised by the examiner Clearly point out the patentable novelty of the claims in view of the cited references Explain how the amendments…
Read MoreWhat are the time limits for prioritized examination requests?
The time limits for prioritized examination requests vary depending on when the request is filed. According to MPEP 708.01: For original applications: The request must be present upon filing. However, the applicant has a one-month period from the first decision on the request to cancel any claims exceeding the limits (4 independent claims, 30 total…
Read MoreWhat should be discussed in an interview prior to first official action in patent examination?
An interview prior to first official action in patent examination can cover several important topics. According to MPEP 713.02, the following subjects may be discussed: The invention and its relation to the prior art Potential rejections or objections that may arise Possible amendments to define the invention over the prior art Any other matters that…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for amending claims in response to a rejection?
When amending claims in response to a rejection, an applicant must: Clearly point out the patentable novelty they believe the claims present in view of the state of the art disclosed by the cited references or objections made Show how the amendments avoid such references or objections As stated in 37 CFR 1.111(c): In amending…
Read MoreCan patent examiners suggest claim amendments during interviews?
Yes, patent examiners can suggest claim amendments during interviews. The MPEP 713.01 states: If the examiner determines that agreement can be reached with respect to the allowability of at least some claims, the examiner may suggest a possible amendment to the attorney or agent. However, it’s important to note that while examiners can suggest amendments,…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for making amendments to patent applications?
Amendments to patent applications must comply with 37 CFR 1.121. The key requirements include: Each section of an amendment document (e.g., Specification Amendments, Claim Amendments, Drawing Amendments, and Remarks) must begin on a separate sheet. Changes to the specification must be made by adding, deleting, or replacing a paragraph; by replacing a section; or by…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for amending claims in a patent application?
When amending claims in a patent application, the following requirements must be met: A complete listing of all claims ever presented must be provided Each claim must have a status identifier in parentheses The text of all pending claims (including withdrawn claims) must be presented Markings must show current changes: underlining for additions and strike-through…
Read More