Can a continuation-in-part (CIP) application claim benefit to multiple prior applications?
Can a continuation-in-part (CIP) application claim benefit to multiple prior applications? Yes, a continuation-in-part (CIP) application can claim benefit to multiple prior applications, provided certain conditions are met. The MPEP states: “An applicant may claim the benefit of the filing date of one or more prior applications under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c)…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between a continuation and a continuation-in-part application?
A continuation application and a continuation-in-part (CIP) application are both types of patent applications that stem from an earlier application, but they differ in their content: Continuation application: Contains the same disclosure as the prior application without adding any new matter. As stated in MPEP 201.07, ‘A continuation application is an application for the invention(s)…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between a continuation-in-part application and a regular continuation application?
A continuation-in-part (CIP) application differs from a regular continuation application in the following ways: A CIP application contains a portion or all of the disclosure of an earlier application and adds matter not disclosed in the earlier application. A regular continuation application contains the same disclosure as the earlier application without adding new matter. As…
Read MoreCan a divisional application include new matter?
No, a divisional application cannot include new matter that was not disclosed in the parent application. The MPEP 201.06 clearly states: ‘A divisional application is a later application for an independent or distinct invention, carved out of a prior application and disclosing and claiming only subject matter disclosed in the prior application.’ This means: The…
Read MoreHow does the effective filing date differ for claims in a continuation-in-part application?
The effective filing date for claims in a continuation-in-part (CIP) application can vary depending on the content of the claims. According to MPEP 201.08: The effective filing date of a claimed invention in a continuation-in-part application is determined on a claim-by-claim basis and is dependent upon the sufficiency of the disclosure in the earlier application(s)…
Read MoreWhat happens if the examiner determines that a continuation or divisional application contains new matter?
If an examiner determines that a continuation or divisional application contains new matter relative to the prior application, the following steps will occur: The examiner will notify the applicant in the next Office action. The examiner will indicate that the application should be redesignated as a continuation-in-part (CIP). According to MPEP 602.05: If the examiner…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle new matter introduced in continuation-in-part applications?
How does the USPTO handle new matter introduced in continuation-in-part applications? Continuation-in-part (CIP) applications are a special case when it comes to new matter. The MPEP 608.04 states: ‘In the case of a continuation-in-part application, any claim directed to matter which was not described in the parent nonprovisional application in the manner provided by the…
Read MoreWhen is a new oath or declaration required for a continuation-in-part application?
When is a new oath or declaration required for a continuation-in-part application? For continuation-in-part (CIP) applications, a new oath or declaration is typically required due to the addition of new matter. According to MPEP 602.05: ‘A continuation-in-part application (which may disclose and claim subject matter not disclosed in the prior application) is considered a continuing…
Read MoreCan I use a copy of an oath or declaration in a continuation-in-part (CIP) application?
The use of a copy of an oath or declaration in a continuation-in-part (CIP) application depends on the filing date of the CIP application: For CIP applications filed on or after September 16, 2012: A copy of an oath or declaration from the prior application may be used. However, the oath or declaration must comply…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for a new oath or declaration in a continuation-in-part application?
A new oath or declaration is required for a continuation-in-part (CIP) application, and it must acknowledge the duty to disclose information material to patentability as defined in 37 CFR 1.56. MPEP 602.02 states: ‘A new oath or declaration is required in a continuation-in-part application, which includes subject matter not disclosed in the prior nonprovisional application.…
Read More