How does the USPTO handle benefit claims in international design applications?
The USPTO handles benefit claims in international design applications according to specific procedures outlined in MPEP 2920.05(e): “Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(d)(2), the nonprovisional application must contain or be amended to contain a reference to the prior international design application, identifying it by international registration number (if assigned) or by application number and filing date…
Read MoreWhat does “effectively filed” mean under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d)?
AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d) establishes criteria for determining when subject matter in a U.S. patent document was “effectively filed” for prior art purposes under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). A U.S. patent document is considered effectively filed as of: Its actual filing date (AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d)(1)), or The filing date of a prior application to…
Read MoreHow should a patent owner handle corrections of factual information in a supplemental examination request?
When a patent owner wishes to correct factual information in a supplemental examination request, such as foreign priority or domestic benefit claims, they should: Include the item of information related to the correction of factual information. Provide one or more additional items of information that show how the patentability of the claims depends on the…
Read MoreWhat are the key differences in filing benefit claims for applications before and after September 16, 2012?
The process for filing benefit claims differs for applications filed before and after September 16, 2012. Key differences include: For applications filed on or after September 16, 2012: File a corrected application data sheet (ADS) under 37 CFR 1.76 The ADS must contain a specific reference to a prior application Must satisfy enablement and written…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle benefit claims in patent application publications for applications filed before and after September 16, 2012?
The USPTO treats benefit claims in patent application publications differently depending on whether the application was filed before or after September 16, 2012. The MPEP states: “For applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, the publication did not include the benefit claim to a prior-filed nonprovisional application where the specific reference was timely submitted…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for claiming benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120 in a design patent application?
To claim benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120 in a design patent application, the following requirements must be met: The later-filed application must contain a reference to the prior-filed copending application. For applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, the specific reference must be in the application data sheet (37 CFR 1.76). For applications filed…
Read MoreHow should priority or benefit claims be made in a reissue application?
Priority or benefit claims in reissue applications must be made according to specific rules. As per MPEP 1410: Priority/benefit claims from the original patent do not automatically carry over to the reissue application. For reissues filed on or after September 16, 2012, claims must be made in an Application Data Sheet (ADS) under 37 CFR…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of the Patent Data Portal in the patent examination process?
The Patent Data Portal plays a crucial role in maintaining accurate records during the patent examination process. It is particularly important when preparing an application for issue. According to the MPEP: If any claim to domestic benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is added, deleted, and/or modified during prosecution of the…
Read MoreCan a design patent application claim benefit from a utility patent application under 35 U.S.C. 120?
Yes, a design patent application can claim benefit from a utility patent application under 35 U.S.C. 120, provided certain conditions are met: The design must be fully disclosed in the earlier utility application in compliance with 35 U.S.C. 112(a). The utility application must meet all the requirements for a proper benefit claim under 35 U.S.C.…
Read MoreCan a design patent application claim benefit from a PCT application under 35 U.S.C. 120?
Yes, a design patent application can claim benefit from a PCT application under 35 U.S.C. 120, provided certain conditions are met: The PCT application must have designated the United States. The design must be fully disclosed in the PCT application in compliance with 35 U.S.C. 112(a). All other requirements for a proper benefit claim under…
Read More