How does a continuing application claim benefit to a prior-filed international application?
How does a continuing application claim benefit to a prior-filed international application? A continuing application can claim benefit to a prior-filed international application that designates the United States. The MPEP 211.01(b) states: ‘A nonprovisional application may claim benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120 to an international application designating the United States only if the international application…
Read MoreHow do I correct a benefit claim in a nonprovisional application after the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78?
How do I correct a benefit claim in a nonprovisional application after the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78? To correct a benefit claim in a nonprovisional application after the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78, you need to file a petition to accept a delayed claim. The MPEP states: “A…
Read MoreHow do I correct the filing date of a prior-filed application in a benefit claim?
How do I correct the filing date of a prior-filed application in a benefit claim? To correct the filing date of a prior-filed application in a benefit claim, you need to follow specific procedures outlined in MPEP 211.02(a). The MPEP states: “If the prior application is a provisional application, and the filing date of the…
Read MoreHow can I correct a timely submitted benefit claim with errors?
How can I correct a timely submitted benefit claim with errors? If you’ve submitted a benefit claim within the required time period but it contains errors, you can correct it without filing a petition. According to MPEP 211.02(a): “A petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and the petition fee would not be required for correcting a…
Read MoreCan I correct inventorship by filing a continuing application?
Yes, you can correct inventorship by filing a continuing application. The MPEP states: Correction of inventorship may also be obtained by the filing of a continuing application under 37 CFR 1.53 without the need for filing a request under 37 CFR 1.48, although it should be noted that the requirements for a request under 37…
Read MoreHow can I correct a missing or incorrect benefit claim on my filing receipt?
If you receive a filing receipt with missing or incorrect benefit claim information, you can request a corrected filing receipt. However, the Office will only grant such a request if the proper reference to the prior application is included: For applications filed on or after September 16, 2012: in an Application Data Sheet (ADS) For…
Read MoreWhat is the procedure for correcting or adding a benefit claim in a design application?
What is the procedure for correcting or adding a benefit claim in a design application? The procedure for correcting or adding a benefit claim in a design application differs from that of utility applications. According to MPEP 211.02(a): “For design applications, an application may be amended to claim priority to or the benefit of a…
Read MoreCan I correct a timely benefit claim without a petition?
Can I correct a timely benefit claim without a petition? Yes, in certain circumstances, you can correct a timely benefit claim without filing a petition. The MPEP 211.02(a) provides guidance on this: If an applicant includes a benefit claim in a timely filed application data sheet (ADS), but the benefit claim contains a typographical error…
Read MoreWhat is a ‘delayed claim’ for priority or benefit in a patent application?
What is a ‘delayed claim’ for priority or benefit in a patent application? A ‘delayed claim’ for priority or benefit in a patent application refers to a claim that is filed after the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78. According to MPEP 211.02(a), “A petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and the petition fee…
Read MoreCan design patent applications claim the benefit of a provisional application?
No, design patent applications cannot directly claim the benefit of a provisional application. The MPEP clearly states: “Design applications may not claim the benefit of a provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e).” This restriction is based on 35 U.S.C. 172. However, there is a potential indirect way to claim some benefit: If a design patent…
Read More