How should applicants respond to new matter objections or rejections?

When responding to new matter objections or rejections, applicants should take the following steps: Review the objection or rejection carefully: Understand whether the issue is with the specification, drawings, or claims. Identify the alleged new matter: Determine which specific content the examiner has identified as new matter. Locate support in the original disclosure: Thoroughly review…

Read More

How can an applicant respond to an examiner’s requirement to add a claim for interference?

When an examiner requires an applicant to add a claim for interference under 37 CFR 41.202(c), the applicant must comply but can also express disagreement. The MPEP outlines several ways an applicant can respond: Identify an existing claim in their application or another of their applications that provides a basis for the proposed interference Add…

Read More

How can an applicant express disagreement with a requirement to add a claim for interference?

While an applicant must comply with a requirement to add a claim under 37 CFR 41.202(c), they can still express disagreement with the requirement. According to MPEP 2304.04(b), an applicant can express disagreement in several ways: Identifying a claim already in its application, or another of its applications, that provides a basis for the proposed…

Read More

How should an examiner evaluate an applicant’s response to a subject matter eligibility rejection?

When evaluating an applicant’s response to a subject matter eligibility rejection, an examiner should: Carefully consider all of applicant’s arguments and evidence Determine if any claim amendments change the broadest reasonable interpretation Reevaluate eligibility if persuasive arguments or evidence are presented Provide a rebuttal in the next Office action if maintaining the rejection The MPEP…

Read More

What options does an applicant have in responding to a subject matter eligibility rejection?

An applicant has several options when responding to a subject matter eligibility rejection: Amend the claim to add additional elements or modify existing elements Present arguments explaining why the rejection is in error Submit evidence to traverse the rejection The MPEP outlines these options: “In response to a rejection based on failure to claim patent-eligible…

Read More

What are the applicant’s options when responding to a biological material deposit requirement?

When an applicant is faced with a biological material deposit requirement during patent examination, they have several options to respond. According to MPEP 2411, once the USPTO has established the necessity for access to a biological material, the applicant can: Demonstrate that access to the biological material is not necessary for satisfying the statutory requirements…

Read More