What is the legal standard for establishing a prima facie case of anticipation or obviousness in product and apparatus claims?
According to MPEP 2112.01(I), a prima facie case of either anticipation or obviousness is established when: The claimed and prior art products are identical or substantially identical in structure or composition, or The claimed and prior art products are produced by identical or substantially identical processes This principle is supported by the following quote from…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of preferred embodiments in genus-species anticipation?
Preferred embodiments play a crucial role in genus-species anticipation in patent law. They can help determine which compounds within a generic formula can be anticipated. The MPEP states: “One may look to the preferred embodiments to determine which compounds can be anticipated.” (MPEP 2131.02) When a prior art reference discloses a generic formula along with…
Read MoreCan drawings in patents be used as prior art?
Yes, drawings in patents can be used as prior art. According to MPEP 2125, “Drawings and pictures can anticipate claims if they clearly show the structure which is claimed.” This applies to both design patents and utility patents. The MPEP further states: “The origin of the drawing is immaterial. For instance, drawings in a design…
Read MoreCan a prior art disclosure be used in an obviousness rejection if it doesn’t meet the anticipation requirements?
Yes, a prior art disclosure can be used in an obviousness rejection even if it doesn’t meet the anticipation requirements. The MPEP clarifies: “The description requirement of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) does not preclude an examiner from applying a disclosure in an obviousness rejection under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 simply because the disclosure…
Read MoreAre there any more FAQs for MPEP 2131.04 – Secondary Considerations?
No, all relevant information from MPEP 2131.04 – Secondary Considerations has been addressed in previous questions and answers. There are no additional key topics or information from this specific section that would warrant new, meaningful FAQs without repeating information or creating redundant questions. To learn more: MPEP Secondary Considerations Anticipation Patent Examination
Read MoreWhen does naming a species in prior art anticipate a claim?
Naming a species in prior art can anticipate a claim when the species is clearly and specifically named, regardless of how many other species are also mentioned. The MPEP states: “A reference that clearly names the claimed species anticipates the claim no matter how many other species are named.” (MPEP 2131.02) This means that even…
Read MoreWhen can multiple references be used in a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection?
While normally only one reference should be used in a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection, multiple references can be used in specific circumstances. According to MPEP 2131.01, multiple references are proper when the extra references are cited to: (A) Prove the primary reference contains an “enabled disclosure;” (B) Explain the meaning of a term used in…
Read MoreHow does the MPEP treat anticipation of ranges in temperature and other process parameters?
The MPEP addresses anticipation of ranges in temperature and other process parameters in MPEP 2131.03. It states: “If the claims are directed to a narrow range, and the reference teaches a broader range, other facts of the case, must be considered when determining whether the narrow range is disclosed with “sufficient specificity” to constitute an…
Read MoreHow does the MPEP address anticipation of ranges in chemical compositions?
The MPEP addresses anticipation of ranges in chemical compositions specifically in MPEP 2131.03. It states: “In the case of a chemical composition, a reference that clearly names the claimed species anticipates the claim no matter what other components are present in the composition.” This means that if a prior art reference discloses a chemical composition…
Read MoreHow does the MPEP address the use of admissions for both anticipation and obviousness?
The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) addresses the use of admissions for both anticipation and obviousness determinations. MPEP 2129 states: “A statement by an applicant in the specification or made during prosecution identifying the work of another as ‘prior art’ is an admission which can be relied upon for both anticipation and obviousness determinations.”…
Read More