How does MPEP 2114 address computer-implemented functional claim limitations?
MPEP 2114 provides specific guidance on computer-implemented functional claim limitations. Key points include: For computer-implemented functional claim limitations, the specification must disclose an algorithm for performing the claimed function. If the specification does not provide a disclosure of the computer and algorithm in sufficient detail, a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C.…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle indefiniteness rejections for computer-implemented functional claim limitations?
How does the USPTO handle indefiniteness rejections for computer-implemented functional claim limitations? The USPTO has specific guidance for handling indefiniteness rejections related to computer-implemented functional claim limitations. According to MPEP 2173.02: “For a computer-implemented functional claim limitation, the specification must disclose an algorithm for performing the claimed specific computer function, or else the claim is…
Read MoreWhat are the key considerations for computer-implemented inventions under 35 U.S.C. 112?
For computer-implemented inventions, there are several key considerations under 35 U.S.C. 112, particularly regarding written description and enablement requirements. The MPEP 2185 highlights: “If the means- (or step-) plus-function limitation is computer-implemented, and the specification does not provide a disclosure of the computer and algorithm in sufficient detail to demonstrate to one of ordinary skill…
Read More