What is the significance of the “effectively filed” date under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d)?

The concept of “effectively filed” date is crucial for determining whether a U.S. patent document qualifies as prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). The MPEP explains: AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d) defines “effectively filed” for the purpose of determining whether a particular U.S. patent document is prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) to a…

Read More

How does the America Invents Act (AIA) affect WIPO published applications as prior art?

The America Invents Act (AIA) significantly changed how WIPO published applications are treated as prior art. According to MPEP 2154.01(a): “AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) explicitly references U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, and WIPO published applications as potential prior art documents.” This means that under the AIA, WIPO published applications are now explicitly recognized as…

Read More

How does the America Invents Act (AIA) affect the applicability of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g)?

The America Invents Act (AIA) significantly changed the U.S. patent system, transitioning from a first-to-invent to a first-inventor-to-file system. This change has important implications for the applicability of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g). The MPEP provides guidance on this matter: This MPEP section has limited applicability to applications subject to examination under the first inventor to…

Read More

How does the AIA define “effective filing date”?

The AIA provides a specific definition for the term “effective filing date” in 35 U.S.C. 100(i)(1). According to the MPEP: The AIA defines the term “effective filing date” for a claimed invention in a patent or application for patent (other than a reissue application or reissued patent) in 35 U.S.C. 100(i)(1) as meaning the earlier…

Read More