How does the AIA’s prior art definition affect patent examiners?
The AIA’s prior art definition significantly affects how patent examiners conduct their searches and evaluate patent applications. As the MPEP states: “Under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), there is no requirement that the prior art relied upon be by others. Thus, any prior art which falls under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) need not be by another…
Read MoreHow does the AIA’s treatment of prior art affect independent inventors?
The AIA’s treatment of prior art has significant implications for independent inventors. Under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), an inventor’s own public disclosures can potentially be used as prior art against their patent application. However, the AIA also provides a grace period: “Disclosures of the subject matter made one year or less before the effective filing…
Read MoreAre there any exceptions to the prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)?
Yes, there are exceptions to what constitutes prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). The MPEP notes: “However, disclosures of the subject matter made one year or less before the effective filing date of the claimed invention by the inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter directly or indirectly from…
Read MoreWhat are the prior art exceptions under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)?
The AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2) provides three exceptions to prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2): 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A): Inventor-originated disclosure exception 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B): Inventor-originated prior public disclosure exception 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C): Common ownership or obligation of assignment exception These exceptions limit the use of an inventor’s own work as prior art and provide…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between pre-AIA and AIA treatment of patent prior art?
What is the difference between pre-AIA and AIA treatment of patent prior art? The America Invents Act (AIA) introduced significant changes to how patent prior art is treated compared to the pre-AIA system. The MPEP 2152.02(a) highlights a key difference: “The AIA draws no distinction between patents and published patent applications as prior art.” This…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between AIA and pre-AIA patent law regarding “in this country”?
The concept of “in this country” differs significantly between the America Invents Act (AIA) and pre-AIA patent law: Pre-AIA: The “in this country” requirement was explicitly stated in 35 U.S.C. 102(b), limiting the public use and on-sale bars to activities within the United States and its territories. AIA: The AIA removed the “in this country”…
Read MoreHow does AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 differ in terminology from pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103?
AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 uses slightly different terminology compared to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103, but this change does not affect the approach to determining obviousness. The MPEP states: “AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 requires consideration of ‘the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art,’ while pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 refers to ‘the differences between…
Read MoreWhat is the one-year grace period under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)?
The AIA introduced a one-year grace period for certain disclosures made by or derived from the inventor. This grace period is defined in AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1). The MPEP explains: AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) effectively provides a one-year grace period (grace period) after a first inventor-originated disclosure of an invention (i.e. a disclosure by an…
Read MoreHow does the AIA’s “on sale” provision differ from pre-AIA law?
While the AIA’s “on sale” provision is largely interpreted similarly to pre-AIA law, there are some key differences. The MPEP highlights two main distinctions: Geographic limitations: “Under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), there is no geographic limitation on where the sale or offer for sale may occur.” This contrasts with pre-AIA law, which limited “on sale”…
Read MoreHow does the AIA joint research agreement provision differ from the CREATE Act?
The AIA joint research agreement provision (AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(c)) and the CREATE Act have two major differences: The AIA provision is based on the effective filing date of the claimed invention, while the CREATE Act focuses on the date the claimed invention was made. The CREATE Act provisions only apply to obviousness rejections, whereas…
Read More