What is the purpose of 37 CFR 1.130 affidavits or declarations?

The purpose of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.130 is to overcome prior art rejections by establishing that: The disclosure was made by the inventor or joint inventor (1.130(a) declaration) The subject matter disclosed was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor (1.130(a) declaration) The subject matter disclosed had been…

Read More

Can a prior art disclosure be used in an obviousness rejection if it doesn’t meet the anticipation requirements?

Yes, a prior art disclosure can be used in an obviousness rejection even if it doesn’t meet the anticipation requirements. The MPEP clarifies: “The description requirement of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) does not preclude an examiner from applying a disclosure in an obviousness rejection under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 simply because the disclosure…

Read More

Is the “how to use” requirement necessary for a prior art document to qualify as anticipatory under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102?

No, the “how to use” requirement is not necessary for a prior art document to qualify as anticipatory under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102. The MPEP explicitly states: “There is, however, no requirement that a prior art document meet the ‘how to use’ requirement of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) in order to qualify as prior art.” This…

Read More

What are the two basic requirements for a prior art document to anticipate a claimed invention under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102?

According to the MPEP, there are two basic requirements for a prior art document to anticipate a claimed invention under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102: Disclosure of elements: “Each and every element of the claimed invention” must be disclosed either explicitly or inherently, and the elements must be “arranged or combined in the same way as…

Read More