How are questions of formal sufficiency and propriety of affidavits reviewed?
Questions of formal sufficiency and propriety of affidavits or declarations are reviewed through a specific process. According to MPEP 717.01(e): Review of questions of formal sufficiency and propriety are by petition filed under 37 CFR 1.181. Such petitions are answered by the Technology Center Directors (MPEP § 1002.02(c)). This means that if there are concerns…
Read MoreWhat information must be included in a declaration under 37 CFR 1.130(b)?
A declaration under 37 CFR 1.130(b) must include specific information to be considered effective. The key elements are: Identification of the subject matter publicly disclosed The date of the public disclosure If the disclosure was in a printed publication, a copy must be provided If not in a printed publication, a detailed description of the…
Read MoreCan a registered practitioner sign an affidavit or declaration on behalf of an inventor?
Yes, a registered practitioner can sign an affidavit or declaration on behalf of an inventor under certain circumstances. According to MPEP 717.01(c): ‘A registered practitioner may sign an affidavit or declaration on behalf of an assignee of the entire interest when (A) the practitioner is authorized to act on behalf of the assignee, and (B)…
Read MoreCan a registered practitioner sign an affidavit or declaration on behalf of an inventor?
No, a registered practitioner cannot sign an affidavit or declaration on behalf of an inventor. According to MPEP 717.01(c): ‘The affidavit or declaration must be signed by the inventor or a joint inventor, or if the inventor is deceased, by the legal representative, or if the inventor is under legal incapacity, by a legal representative.’…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.132?
Affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.132 serve to provide evidence to traverse rejections or objections in patent applications. The MPEP 716 states: ‘The purpose of filing affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.132 is to traverse the rejections or objections of record.’ These affidavits or declarations can be used to present various types of…
Read MoreWho reviews the sufficiency of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.130?
The sufficiency of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.130 is reviewed and decided by a primary examiner. As stated in MPEP 717.01(e): The question of sufficiency of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.130 should be reviewed and decided by a primary examiner. This means that the primary examiner is responsible for evaluating whether…
Read MoreWho decides on the sufficiency of affidavits under 37 CFR 1.131(a)?
According to MPEP 715.08, the primary examiner is responsible for reviewing and deciding on the sufficiency of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.131(a). The MPEP states: The question of sufficiency of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.131(a) should be reviewed and decided by a primary examiner. This means that the primary examiner has…
Read MoreHow should facts be presented in affidavits or declarations for patent applications?
When presenting facts in affidavits or declarations for patent applications, it’s crucial to provide specific, factual information rather than mere conclusions. According to MPEP 717.01(c): ‘Affidavits or declarations presented to show that the disclosure of an application is sufficient to one skilled in the art are not acceptable to establish facts for the reason that…
Read MoreHow should facts be presented in affidavits or declarations for antedating a reference?
When presenting facts in affidavits or declarations for antedating a reference, it’s crucial to follow the guidelines outlined in MPEP 715.07. The key points are: Present specific facts, not conclusions Provide clear and convincing evidence of prior invention Include dates of conception and reduction to practice Explain any delay between conception and reduction to practice…
Read MoreHow are timely submitted affidavits and declarations handled by the patent examiner?
When affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.130 are timely submitted and admitted, the patent examiner is required to acknowledge and comment on them in the next office action. According to MPEP 717.01(f): All admitted affidavits and declarations are acknowledged and commented upon by the examiner in the next succeeding action, and an indication of…
Read More