How does the effective filing date affect prior art rejections?
How does the effective filing date affect prior art rejections? The effective filing date of a claimed invention is crucial in determining what qualifies as prior art for rejections. According to MPEP 2152: “The effective filing date of a claimed invention is determined on a claim-by-claim basis and not an application-by-application basis. It is possible…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102 and 35 U.S.C. 103?
What is the difference between rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102 and 35 U.S.C. 103? Rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102 and 35 U.S.C. 103 serve different purposes in patent examination: 35 U.S.C. 102 (Anticipation): This rejection is used when a single prior art reference discloses every element of the claimed invention. As stated in the MPEP…
Read MoreHow are Defensive Publications cited as prior art?
Defensive Publications are cited as prior art under specific conditions: They are considered printed publications and cited under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or 102(b). They become effective as prior art from the date of publication in the Official Gazette. They can be used alone or in combination with other prior art…
Read MoreHow can co-authorship affect a pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection?
When an inventor or at least one joint inventor is a co-author of a publication cited against an application, MPEP 715.01(c) outlines two ways to overcome a rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (e): Filing an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a). Filing a specific affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.132 establishing…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between anticipation and obviousness in patent rejections?
What is the difference between anticipation and obviousness in patent rejections? Anticipation and obviousness are two distinct grounds for rejecting a patent application based on prior art: Anticipation (35 U.S.C. 102): This occurs when a single prior art reference discloses all elements of the claimed invention. As stated in MPEP 2131, “A claim is anticipated…
Read MoreWhat are the different types of prior art rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102?
What are the different types of prior art rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102? Under 35 U.S.C. 102, there are several types of prior art rejections that patent examiners can use. According to MPEP 706.02, the main types are: 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) rejections: Based on public disclosures before the effective filing date 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) rejections:…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of MPEP 715.01(c)?
MPEP 715.01(c) provides guidance on how to overcome a rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 when the reference cited is a publication of the inventor’s own invention. The section explains: Unless it is a statutory bar, a rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 prior art based on a publication may be overcome by a showing…
Read MoreWhat MPEP sections cover rejections under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102?
For patent applications subject to the America Invents Act (AIA), information on rejections under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 can be found in MPEP §§ 2151 – 2156. These sections provide detailed guidance on how to apply the AIA version of 35 U.S.C. 102 in patent examination. The AIA version of 35 U.S.C. 102 applies to…
Read MoreHow does the AIA first inventor to file system affect prior art rejections?
How does the AIA first inventor to file system affect prior art rejections? The America Invents Act (AIA) introduced the first inventor to file system, which significantly impacts prior art rejections. According to MPEP 706.02: ‘AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) define the prior art that will preclude the grant of a patent on a…
Read MoreCan 37 CFR 1.131(c) be used to disqualify anticipatory prior art?
No, 37 CFR 1.131(c) cannot be used to disqualify anticipatory prior art. The MPEP clearly states: A U.S. patent or U.S. patent application publication that anticipates the claimed subject matter cannot be disqualified as prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) or 37 CFR 1.131(c). This means that if a U.S. patent or U.S. patent…
Read More