How does the MPEP define a “patent” for prior art purposes under 35 U.S.C. 102?

The MPEP 2126 provides a specific definition for what constitutes a “patent” in the context of prior art rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102. It states: “The term ‘patent’ as used in 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a), (b), and (d) includes utility models, inventor’s certificates, and similar patent rights issued by foreign countries.”…

Read More

What are the requirements for examining claims under 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 with means-plus-function limitations?

When examining claims with means-plus-function limitations under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 35 U.S.C. 103, examiners must consider both the claimed subject matter and the means or step that performs the specified function. The MPEP 2185 states: “When examining the claims under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 a determination of whether the prior art anticipates or…

Read More