What is the relationship between the written description and enablement requirements?
The written description and enablement requirements are separate and distinct, as stated in the MPEP: “This requirement is separate and distinct from the enablement requirement.” While both requirements are part of 35 U.S.C. 112(a), they serve different purposes: The written description requirement ensures that the inventor had possession of the claimed invention at the time…
Read MoreHow does the written description requirement apply to new or amended claims?
For new or amended claims, the applicant must show support in the original disclosure. The MPEP states: “With respect to newly added or amended claims, applicant should show support in the original disclosure for the new or amended claims.” The examiner has the initial burden of presenting evidence or reasoning why a person skilled in…
Read MoreHow can an inventor show possession of the claimed invention?
An inventor can show possession of the claimed invention in several ways, as outlined in the MPEP: Describing an actual reduction to practice of the claimed invention Showing that the invention was “ready for patenting” through drawings or structural chemical formulas Describing distinguishing identifying characteristics sufficient to show possession The MPEP states: “Possession may be…
Read MoreWhat is the ‘representative number of species’ concept in written description?
The ‘representative number of species’ concept is crucial in demonstrating adequate written description for a claimed genus. The MPEP explains: “A “representative number of species” means that the species which are adequately described are representative of the entire genus. Thus, when there is substantial variation within the genus, one must describe a sufficient variety of…
Read MoreHow does the level of skill in the art affect the written description requirement?
The level of skill in the art plays a significant role in determining whether the written description requirement is met. The MPEP states: “The description needed to satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112 ‘varies with the nature and scope of the invention at issue, and with the scientific and technologic knowledge already in existence.’”…
Read MoreWhat is the role of drawings in satisfying the written description requirement?
Drawings can play a crucial role in satisfying the written description requirement. The MPEP states: “An applicant may show that the inventor was in possession of an invention by disclosure of drawings or structural chemical formulas that are sufficiently detailed to show that the inventor was in possession of the claimed invention as a whole.”…
Read More