What are the time limits for responding to Office actions in ex parte reexamination?
The time limits for responding to Office actions in ex parte reexamination are strictly defined in the MPEP and patent regulations. According to MPEP 2260: “The time for response to any Office action in an ex parte reexamination proceeding will normally be two months… The response period may be extended only upon a showing of…
Read MoreWhat are the time limits for requesting rehearing of a Board decision?
According to MPEP 2682, the time limits for requesting rehearing of a Board decision are as follows: The request must be filed within one month from the date of: The original decision under 37 CFR 41.77(a) The original 37 CFR 41.77(b) decision under the provisions of 37 CFR 41.77(b)(2) The expiration of the time for…
Read MoreWhat are the time limits for patent owner submissions after an ACP?
The time limits for patent owner submissions after an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP) are as follows: The submission must be filed within the time period set for response to the ACP, typically 30 days or one month (whichever is longer) from the ACP mailing date. An extension may be requested under 37 CFR 1.956, but…
Read MoreHow long do parties have to correct defects in inter partes reexamination submissions?
Parties typically have one month or thirty days, whichever is longer, from the mailing date of the form PTOL-2069 or equivalent letter to correct defects in their submissions. The MPEP 2666.50 states: “A time period of one month or thirty days, whichever is longer, from the mailing date of the form PTOL-2069 or equivalent letter…
Read MoreWhat are the time limits for filing an appeal brief in ex parte reexamination?
The time limit for filing an appeal brief in ex parte reexamination is two months from the date of the appeal. As stated in the MPEP: “The time for filing the appeal brief is two (2) months from the date of the appeal.” This time limit is important for patent owners to ensure their appeal…
Read MoreWhat are the time limits for adding a required claim for interference?
When an examiner requires an applicant to add a claim for interference purposes using Form Paragraph 23.04, specific time limits apply. According to MPEP 2304.04(b), the standard time limit is two months from the mailing date of the communication requiring the claim. The form paragraph states: “Applicant is given TWO (2) MONTHS from the mailing…
Read MoreWhat is the time limit for a third party requester to comment on a patent owner’s response in inter partes reexamination?
In inter partes reexamination, the third party requester must file comments on a patent owner’s response within a specific time frame. While the exact time limit is not explicitly stated in the provided MPEP section, it is generally 30 days from the date of service of the patent owner’s response. This can be inferred from…
Read MoreWhat is the time limit for third-party comments after a patent owner’s response in inter partes reexamination?
In inter partes reexamination, third parties have a specific time frame to submit comments after the patent owner’s response. According to MPEP 2666.05: “The third party requester comments must be filed “within 30 days from the date of service of the patent owner’s response.” This 30-day period is strictly enforced, and late submissions will not…
Read MoreWhat is the time limit for responding to a rejection based on a deposit issue?
When facing a rejection based on a deposit issue, applicants must be aware of the time limits for response. According to MPEP 2411.02: “If an application is otherwise in condition for allowance except for a needed deposit and the file record indicates that the deposit has not been made or identified as required, the examiner…
Read MoreIs there a time limit for requesting reexamination of a patent?
While there is a specific time limit for the USPTO to decide on a reexamination request, the timeframe for filing such a request is much broader. According to MPEP 2241: “A determination to reexamine may be made at any time during the period of enforceability of a patent.” This means that a request for reexamination…
Read More