What statement must be included in the transmittal letter for sequence listing submissions on compact disc?
When submitting a sequence listing on compact disc, a specific statement must be included in the transmittal letter. According to MPEP 2422.03: “A statement that the content of the compact disc is duplicative of the written sequence listing, if such a written sequence listing is filed with the application, must be included in the transmittal…
Read MoreHow is the transmittal fee for an international design application determined?
The transmittal fee for an international design application filed through the USPTO as an office of indirect filing is determined based on the entity status of the applicant. According to MPEP 2910: “The transmittal fee is discounted for small and micro entities. Payment, by any party, of the exact amount of the small entity transmittal…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for submitting a translated “Sequence Listing XML”?
When submitting a translated “Sequence Listing XML”, the following requirements apply: The translation must comply with 37 CFR 1.831 through 1.834. The translated “Sequence Listing XML” should contain English versions of any previously non-English language-dependent free text elements. Updated values for attributes in the root element (37 CFR 1.833(b)(2)(iii)) or elements of the general information…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of transitional phrases in patent claims?
Transitional phrases in patent claims are crucial as they define the scope of a claim with respect to additional components or steps. The MPEP states, The transitional phrases “comprising”, “consisting essentially of” and “consisting of” define the scope of a claim with respect to what unrecited additional components or steps, if any, are excluded from…
Read MoreHow do transitional phrases affect the interpretation of Markush groups in patent claims?
How do transitional phrases affect the interpretation of Markush groups in patent claims? Transitional phrases can significantly impact the interpretation of Markush groups in patent claims: “Consisting of” with Markush groups: Limits the claim to only the listed members of the Markush group. “Comprising” or “including” with Markush groups: Generally interpreted as open-ended, allowing for…
Read MoreWhat is the “transformation or reduction of an article” consideration in practical application analysis?
What is the “transformation or reduction of an article” consideration in practical application analysis? The “transformation or reduction of an article” consideration is one of the factors used to determine if a claim integrates a judicial exception into a practical application. According to MPEP 2106.04(d): “Effecting a transformation or reduction of a particular article to…
Read MoreWhat qualifies as a “transformation” under MPEP 2106.05(c)?
According to MPEP 2106.05(c), a transformation under the particular transformation consideration involves changing an “article” to a different state or thing. The MPEP provides the following guidance: Article: “An ‘article’ includes a physical object or substance.” Particularity: “The physical object or substance must be particular, meaning it can be specifically identified.” Change: “‘Transformation’ of an…
Read MoreHow does “transformation” factor into patent eligibility?
Transformation of an article to a different state or thing is an important consideration in patent eligibility analysis. MPEP 2106.05(c) states: “Transformation and reduction of an article ‘to a different state or thing’ is the clue to patentability of a process claim that does not include particular machines.” The MPEP provides some factors to consider:…
Read MoreHow does “transformation” relate to particular treatment in patent claims?
The concept of “transformation” is closely related to particular treatment in patent claims, as discussed in MPEP 2106.04(d)(2). The MPEP states: “[A] treatment or prophylaxis limitation encompasses more than just the step of ‘administering’ a medication or therapy. For example, ‘administering a medication’ to a patient may also include the steps of determining the appropriate…
Read MoreHow does the transformation of an article to a different state or thing impact patent eligibility?
The transformation of an article to a different state or thing can significantly impact patent eligibility. According to MPEP 2106.05(c): “A transformation resulting in the transformed article having a different function or use, would likely provide significantly more, but a transformation resulting in the transformed article merely having a different location, would likely not provide…
Read More