How should unbranched nucleotide sequences be presented in patent applications?

How should unbranched nucleotide sequences be presented in patent applications? According to MPEP 2421.02, unbranched nucleotide sequences in patent applications must be presented as follows: They must be listed using a single letter code for nucleotide bases. Sequences with 10 or more nucleotides must be represented in the sequence listing. Each sequence must be assigned…

Read More

What happens if a biological deposit referenced in a patent application becomes unavailable?

If a biological deposit referenced in a patent application becomes unavailable, the examiner will treat the application as if no deposit existed. According to MPEP 2407.01: “When the Office is so informed or otherwise becomes aware that samples of the deposited material cannot be furnished by the depository, the examiner will treat the application as…

Read More

What is unauthorized participation by a protestor in patent examination?

Unauthorized participation by a protestor refers to any ex parte communication between the protestor and Office personnel, including examiners, regarding substantive matters of a patent application. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) Section 1907 explicitly states: “Office personnel must exercise care to ensure that substantive matters relating to the application are not discussed ex…

Read More

What happens to unauthorized or improper papers filed in a supplemental examination proceeding?

According to MPEP 2813, unauthorized or improper papers filed in a supplemental examination proceeding are not entered into the official file or considered. If such papers are inadvertently entered, they will be expunged. Specifically, 37 CFR 1.620(c) states: “if an unauthorized or otherwise improper paper is filed in a supplemental examination proceeding, it will not…

Read More

What types of persons typically file ex parte reexamination requests?

MPEP 2212 provides a non-exhaustive list of persons who are likely to use the ex parte reexamination process under 35 U.S.C. 302: Patentees Licensees Potential licensees Attorneys without identification of their real client in interest Infringers Potential exporters Patent litigants Interference applicants International Trade Commission respondents This diverse list reflects the various stakeholders in the…

Read More

What are the typical circumstances where adequate written description issues arise in patent applications?

The MPEP 2163.03 outlines three typical circumstances where adequate written description issues arise: Original claims: When the claims define the invention in functional language specifying a desired result but the specification does not sufficiently describe how the function is performed or the result is achieved. New or amended claims: When the claims are not supported…

Read More

What types of treatments or prophylaxis are considered in Step 2A Prong Two?

According to MPEP 2106.04(d)(2), examples of “treatment” and “prophylaxis” limitations include: Acupuncture Administration of medication Dialysis Organ transplants Phototherapy Physiotherapy Radiation therapy Surgery The MPEP states: “Examples of ‘treatment’ and prophylaxis’ limitations encompass limitations that treat or prevent a disease or medical condition, including, e.g., acupuncture, administration of medication, dialysis, organ transplants, phototherapy, physiotherapy, radiation…

Read More