How does the USPTO handle correspondence for applications with multiple applicants?
How does the USPTO handle correspondence for applications with multiple applicants? The USPTO has specific rules for handling correspondence in applications with multiple applicants: For applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, the USPTO will direct correspondence to the first named applicant, unless a practitioner is appointed. For applications filed before September 16, 2012,…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of a customer number in USPTO correspondence?
What is the significance of a customer number in USPTO correspondence? A customer number is a crucial tool for managing correspondence with the USPTO. According to MPEP 403: ‘A customer number allows an applicant, attorney or agent to easily change the correspondence address for a number of applications or patents by simply requesting a change…
Read MoreCan a patent attorney or agent not of record file papers in patent applications?
Yes, registered attorneys or agents not of record can file papers in patent applications and reexamination proceedings under 37 CFR 1.34. The MPEP states: Filing of such papers is considered to be a representation that the attorney or agent is authorized to act in a representative capacity on behalf of applicant. This means that by…
Read MoreHow can a registered practitioner show authorization to conduct an interview?
Registered practitioners can show authorization to conduct an interview in several ways: By being an attorney or agent of record with a power of attorney By having an authorization to act in a representative capacity By completing, signing, and filing an Applicant Initiated Interview Request Form (PTOL-413A) The MPEP states: Registered practitioners, when acting in…
Read MoreCan a third party conduct an interview or take action in a patent application?
Generally, third parties are not permitted to conduct interviews or take actions in patent applications. The MPEP clearly states: The use of the provisions of 37 CFR 1.34 by a third party or its representative to conduct an interview, or take other action not specifically permitted by the rules of practice in an application for…
Read MoreWhat are the confidentiality requirements for interviews about unpublished patent applications?
For unpublished patent applications, confidentiality is a critical concern. The MPEP states: An interview concerning an application that has not been published under 35 U.S.C. 122(b) with an attorney or agent not of record who obtains authorization through use of the interview request form will be conducted based on the information and files supplied by…
Read MoreWhen can an attorney or agent not of record change the correspondence address?
The MPEP provides specific guidance on when an attorney or agent not of record can change the correspondence address. It states: See MPEP § 402.03 for information regarding when a change of correspondence address or a document granting access (i.e., a power to inspect) may be signed by an attorney or agent who is not…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for a registered practitioner to obtain access to an application?
What are the requirements for a registered practitioner to obtain access to an application? According to MPEP 405, a registered practitioner may obtain access to an application if they fulfill the following requirements: The practitioner must be acting in a representative capacity The practitioner must have proper authority from the applicant or attorney or agent…
Read MoreCan an inventor’s attorney conduct an interview without a power of attorney?
Can an inventor’s attorney conduct an interview without a power of attorney? Yes, an inventor’s attorney can conduct an interview without a power of attorney under certain conditions. The MPEP 405 provides guidance on this matter: Interviews may be granted to an attorney or agent who is not of record in an application if the…
Read MoreCan a patent practitioner appoint a substitute to take over after their death?
No, a patent practitioner cannot appoint a substitute to take over their cases after death. The MPEP 406 clearly states: “The patent practitioner may not appoint a ‘substitute’ and any attempt by the patent practitioner to appoint a ‘substitute’ patent practitioner whose power is intended to survive his or her own will not be recognized…
Read More