How does the USPTO determine if an SNQ exists for patent reexamination?
The USPTO determines if a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) exists for patent reexamination through a careful evaluation process. According to MPEP 2242: “If a reexamination request relies on references already considered by the Office, the request must demonstrate that a substantial new question of patentability is raised by the art, when the art…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between a “substantial new question of patentability” and a “prima facie case of unpatentability”?
The concepts of a “substantial new question of patentability” (SNQ) and a “prima facie case of unpatentability” are distinct in patent law, particularly in the context of reexamination proceedings. According to MPEP 2242: It is not necessary that a ‘prima facie’ case of unpatentability exist as to the claim in order for ‘a substantial new…
Read MoreWhat is a “substantial new question of patentability” in patent reexamination?
A “substantial new question of patentability” (SNQ) is the key criterion for deciding whether to order reexamination of a patent under 35 U.S.C. 302. According to the MPEP 2242, an SNQ exists when: Prior art patents or printed publications raise a substantial question of patentability for at least one claim, and The same question has…
Read MoreWhat is a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) in patent reexamination?
A substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) is a crucial concept in patent reexamination. According to MPEP 2242: “If the prior art patents and/or printed publications raise a substantial new question of patentability as to at least one claim of the patent, then a substantial new question of patentability as to the patent is present,…
Read MoreWhat are the exceptions to finding an SNQ in patent reexamination?
There are specific exceptions to finding a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) in patent reexamination. The MPEP 2242 outlines these exceptions: “A prior art patent or printed publication cannot be properly applied as a ground for reexamination if it is merely cumulative to, or less relevant than, prior art patents or printed publications already…
Read More