How should examiners use abstracts in prior art rejections?

Examiners should be cautious when using abstracts for prior art rejections. The MPEP provides the following guidance: When both the abstract and the underlying document qualify as prior art, the underlying document should normally be used to support a rejection. When relying on an abstract, “the evidence relied upon is the facts contained in the…

Read More

Can machine translations be used for foreign language prior art documents?

Yes, examiners can use machine translations of foreign language documents in prior art rejections, but with certain considerations. The MPEP provides the following guidance: “Examiners may rely on a machine translation of a foreign language document unless the machine translation is not of sufficient quality to be adequate evidence of the contents of the document.“…

Read More

What are the guidelines for using the “best available art” in prior art rejections?

The MPEP provides guidelines for using the “best available art” in prior art rejections. The general principle is stated as: “Prior art rejections should ordinarily be confined strictly to the best available art.“ However, there are exceptions to this rule. The MPEP mentions that exceptions may be properly made in certain cases, although it doesn’t…

Read More