What is required for a petition to restore the benefit of a provisional application?

A petition to restore the benefit of a provisional application under 37 CFR 1.78(b) must include several elements. According to MPEP 211.01(a): ‘A petition under 37 CFR 1.78(b) requires: (A) the reference required by 35 U.S.C. 119(e) and 37 CFR 1.78 to the prior-filed provisional application, which must be included in application data sheet (unless…

Read More

What happens if the required translation or statement is missing for a non-English provisional application?

If the required translation or statement is missing for a non-English provisional application, the following consequences apply: The USPTO will issue a notice stating that the required documents are missing. The applicant must supply the missing translation and/or statement in the provisional application. The applicant must provide confirmation in the present application that the translation…

Read More

Can I file the English translation and accuracy statement in the nonprovisional application instead of the provisional application?

Generally, the English translation and accuracy statement for a non-English provisional application must be filed in the provisional application itself, not in the nonprovisional application. However, there is an exception: As noted in the MPEP, Do not use this form paragraph if a translation of the provisional application and a statement that the translation was…

Read More

What is the purpose of Form Paragraph 2.38 in the MPEP regarding non-English provisional applications?

Form Paragraph 2.38 in the MPEP serves several important purposes regarding non-English provisional applications: It notifies the applicant that an English translation and/or a statement of translation accuracy is required for a non-English language provisional application. It informs the applicant about the specific documents that are missing from their application. It provides clear instructions on…

Read More

When can a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 386(c) be made?

According to 37 CFR 1.78(j), benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 386(c) can only be made in specific types of applications filed on or after May 13, 2015. The MPEP states: “37 CFR 1.78(j) provides that benefit under 35 U.S.C. 386(c) with respect to an international design application can only be claimed in nonprovisional applications, international…

Read More

How does claiming the benefit of an international design application affect the effective filing date?

Claiming the benefit of an international design application under 35 U.S.C. 386(c) can potentially establish an earlier effective filing date for a nonprovisional application. This is significant because the effective filing date is used to determine which prior art is applicable during examination. As stated in the MPEP: “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 386(c), in accordance…

Read More

What are the requirements for benefit claims under different U.S. Code sections?

Benefit claims can be made under various sections of the U.S. Code, each with specific requirements: 35 U.S.C. 119(e): For provisional application benefits, refer to 37 CFR 1.78(a). 35 U.S.C. 120: For benefit claims to earlier nonprovisional applications, including the relationship (continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part). 35 U.S.C. 121: For divisional applications. 35 U.S.C. 365(c): For…

Read More